Acer Aspire M3800

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics5.19% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAcer Aspire M3800  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer EG43M
Memory4 GB free of 6 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100601
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 17 '22 at 19:57
Run Duration194 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium E5500
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
42.4% Average
Memory 70.5
1-Core 44.4
2-Core 86.1
43% 67 Pts
4-Core 86.8
8-Core 86.2
12% 86.5 Pts
64-Core 86.9
5% 86.9 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 42.4%
Great: 43%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730
MSI(1462 8A9F) 2GB
CLim: 901 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 472.12
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
5.19% Terrible
Lighting 6.4
Reflection 5.3
Parallax 8
5% 6.57 fps
MRender 3.9
Gravity 7.3
Splatting 7.1
5% 6.1 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.19%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung HD103SI 1TB-$89
733GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1AG01118
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 71 77 89 75 100 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
47.2% Average
Read 85.1
Write 96.7
Mixed 53.1
SusWrite 79.2
58% 78.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
148% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 47.2%
Great: 59%
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 16GB-$8
11GB free, PID 5581
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.8 6.1 8 8 8 7.6 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
14.6% Very poor
Read 32.2
Write 8.5
Mixed 16.4
SusWrite 7.1
18% 16 MB/s
4K Read 4.2
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 3
199% 3.2 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 14.6%
Great: 35%
Samsung M3 Portable 1TB
378GB free, PID 61b6
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 22 23 23 19 19 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
16.3% Very poor
Read 32.5
Write 27.8
Mixed 26
SusWrite 21.8
36% 27 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
107% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 16.3%
Great: 42%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown M378B5673EH1-CH9 029E VS2GB1333D4 80CE M378B5673EH1-CH9 6GB
800, 800, 800 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
14.8% Very poor
MC Read 5.3
MC Write 3.9
MC Mixed 3.8
12% 4.33 GB/s
SC Read 4.6
SC Write 4.3
SC Mixed 4.1
12% 4.33 GB/s
Latency 100
40% 100 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 14.8%
Great: 15%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire M3800 Builds (Compare 24 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire M3800

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $232
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback