Today's hottest deals

Asus ROG STRIX Z590-E GAMING WIFI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 109%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics7.43% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive381% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX Z590-E GAMING WIFI  (all builds)
Memory10.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220127
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 18 '22 at 14:06
Run Duration240 Seconds
Run User PSE-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-11900K-$270
LGA1200, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Memory 90.7
1-Core 178
2-Core 362
112% 210 Pts
4-Core 684
8-Core 1,220
115% 952 Pts
64-Core 1,753
108% 1,753 Pts
Poor: 94%
This bench: 109%
Great: 112%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 750
Asus(1043 8694) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.100.9805
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
7.43% Terrible
Lighting 8.3
Reflection 14.9
Parallax 10.9
7% 11.4 fps
MRender 12.3
Gravity 8.8
Splatting 10.9
9% 10.7 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 7.43%
Great: 8%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$100
258GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1636 1341 1269 1184 1094 1017 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
381% Outstanding
Read 2,696
Write 2,485
Mixed 1,716
SusWrite 1,257
456% 2,038 MB/s
4K Read 74.3
4K Write 259
4K Mixed 112
393% 148 MB/s
DQ Read 1,776
DQ Write 1,575
DQ Mixed 1,614
1,227% 1,655 MB/s
Poor: 214%
This bench: 381%
Great: 372%
Toshiba X300 4TB-$116
727GB free
Firmware: FP1R
SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 143 149 147 149 145 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
72.3% Very good
Read 105
Write 103
Mixed 23.5
SusWrite 147
68% 94.7 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
179% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 72.3%
Great: 104%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$60
216GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 71 72 72 72 73 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
42.7% Average
Read 76.7
Write 71.3
Mixed 71.9
SusWrite 71.7
54% 72.9 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
151% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 42.7%
Great: 76%
USBKey USBKeyCo., 0GB
0GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
3.53% Terrible
Read 0.5
Write 1
Mixed 0.7
SusWrite 1.1
1% 0.83 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.8
63% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 1%
This bench: 3.53%
Great: 4%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hewlett-Packard 7EH92AA# 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing below potential (74th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
92.5% Outstanding
MC Read 36.2
MC Write 33.7
MC Mixed 28.5
94% 32.8 GB/s
SC Read 25.3
SC Write 35.3
SC Mixed 28
84% 29.5 GB/s
Latency 66.2
60% 66.2 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 92.5%
Great: 111%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG STRIX Z590-E GAMING WIFI Builds (Compare 9,034 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 190%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 107%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 191%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX Z590-E GAMING WIFI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 78% - Very good Total price: $1,118
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback