Asus TUF Gaming FX505DT_FX505DT

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics11.2% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive153% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemAsus TUF Gaming FX505DT_FX505DT  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FX505DT
Memory12 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210128
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 23 '22 at 18:45
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (77th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3550H
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
72.3% Very good
Memory 75.8
1-Core 115
2-Core 218
76% 136 Pts
4-Core 370
8-Core 549
57% 460 Pts
64-Core 566
35% 566 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 72.3%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Vega 8 Graphics
Asus(1043 18F1) 128MB
Ram: 128MB, Driver: 22.5.2
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
11.2% Very poor
Lighting 13.7
Reflection 60
Parallax 19.8
11% 31.2 fps
MRender 11.7
Gravity 17.1
Splatting 13.1
11% 14 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 11.2%
Great: 13%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Micron_2200V_MTFDHBA512TCK 512GB
144GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P1MA0V4
SusWrite @10s intervals: 976 657 465 230 425 252 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
153% Outstanding
Read 1,102
Write 998
Mixed 1,009
SusWrite 501
202% 902 MB/s
4K Read 40.4
4K Write 74.8
4K Mixed 48
162% 54.4 MB/s
DQ Read 464
DQ Write 814
DQ Mixed 637
484% 638 MB/s
Poor: 94%
This bench: 153%
Great: 181%
Fujitsu MHZ2320BH G2 320GB
80GB free
Firmware: 00000009
SusWrite @10s intervals: 44 45 46 46 46 46 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
25.8% Poor
Read 43.9
Write 42.2
Mixed 29.9
SusWrite 45.6
30% 40.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.5
108% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 25.8%
Great: 35%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CTD GR2666S464L19S/8G 16GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
82.9% Excellent
MC Read 30.7
MC Write 31.6
MC Mixed 27
85% 29.8 GB/s
SC Read 22.1
SC Write 32.8
SC Mixed 23.6
75% 26.2 GB/s
Latency 88.8
45% 88.8 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 82.9%
Great: 83%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF Gaming FX505DT_FX505DT Builds (Compare 2,846 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

System: Asus TUF Gaming FX505DT_FX505DT

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $162Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $380
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback