Today's hottest deals

Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X705QA_X705QA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 46%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics6.77% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive93.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (91%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X705QA_X705QA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X705QA
Memory11.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191031
Uptime5.7 Days
Run DateApr 11 '20 at 09:15
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU 91%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A12-9720P APU (2016 M.BR)
P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
46% Average
Memory 64.7
1-Core 48.4
2-Core 104
44% 72.2 Pts
4-Core 159
8-Core 165
22% 162 Pts
64-Core 169
10% 169 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 46%
Great: 45%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R7 Graphics
Asus(1043 1911) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 19.10.22.09
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
6.77% Terrible
Lighting 8.3
Reflection 9.81
Parallax 11
7% 9.7 fps
MRender 7
Gravity 8.9
Splatting 8.65
7% 8.18 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.77%
Great: 8%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ3 512GB
408GB free (System drive)
Firmware: E8FK11.T
SusWrite @10s intervals: 584 477 448 489 505 504 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
93.3% Outstanding
Read 545
Write 686
Mixed 637
SusWrite 501
134% 592 MB/s
4K Read 24.2
4K Write 42.4
4K Mixed 29.2
96% 31.9 MB/s
DQ Read 264
DQ Write 221
DQ Mixed 305
212% 264 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 93.3%
Great: 150%
Seagate ST1000LM048-2E7172 1TB
931GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 122 124 126 126 122 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
66.6% Good
Read 108
Write 114
Mixed 62
SusWrite 123
75% 102 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
182% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 66.6%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CTD GR2666S464L19S/8G 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
29.4% Poor
MC Read 12.5
MC Write 7.2
MC Mixed 11.8
30% 10.5 GB/s
SC Read 6.1
SC Write 4.7
SC Mixed 8.6
18% 6.47 GB/s
Latency 114
35% 114 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 29.4%
Great: 83%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X705QA_X705QA Builds (Compare 9 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X705QA_X705QA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $376WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $250Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback