Today's hottest deals

Oegstone DQ67SW

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics26.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive64.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemOegstone DQ67SW  (all builds)
MotherboardIntel DQ67SW
Memory1.1 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181024
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 30 '22 at 10:13
Run Duration229 Seconds
Run User LTU-User
Background CPU 23%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E31225
SKTH, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
70% Good
Memory 91.7
1-Core 73.4
2-Core 157
65% 107 Pts
4-Core 276
8-Core 310
38% 293 Pts
64-Core 308
19% 308 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 70%
Great: 75%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101
Asus(1043 85D7) 2GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 460.79
Performing below potential (73rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
26.4% Poor
Lighting 33.4
Reflection 33.9
Parallax 35.9
27% 34.4 fps
MRender 36.1
Gravity 34.1
Splatting 23.4
25% 31.2 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 26.4%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Apacer AS350 256GB
98GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AP613PE0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 218 172 93 67 86 60 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
64.3% Good
Read 434
Write 263
Mixed 310
SusWrite 116
62% 281 MB/s
4K Read 25.3
4K Write 47.1
4K Mixed 25.8
96% 32.7 MB/s
DQ Read 260
DQ Write 205
DQ Mixed 38.3
82% 168 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 64.3%
Great: 100%
Seagate Backup+ BK 1TB
803GB free
Firmware: 0836
SusWrite @10s intervals: MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
13.5% Very poor
Read 29.7
Write 24.8
Mixed 24.1
SusWrite 16.8
18% 23.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
149% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 13.5%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5471-001.A00LF 99U5458-001.A00LF 4GB
1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
47.8% Average
MC Read 16.7
MC Write 17.7
MC Mixed 14.7
47% 16.4 GB/s
SC Read 12.3
SC Write 13.9
SC Mixed 13.6
38% 13.3 GB/s
Latency 64.6
62% 64.6 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical DQ67SW Builds (Compare 227 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard

System: Oegstone DQ67SW

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Very good Total price: $270
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback