Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (94th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 6 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Memory	62.5GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 62.5GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced.

PC Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 148 User benchmarks, average bench 57% None, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	71.9% Very good	Memory 75.1 1-Core 91.9 2-Core 184 67% 117 Pts	4-Core 369 8-Core 721 65% 545 Pts	64-Core 1208 75% 1208 Pts
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 71.9% Great: 72%

Drives	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Virtual HD 136GB 509 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 67GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.1.0 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 2,368 Write 2,422 Mixed 2394 536% 2,394 MB/s	4K Read 43.8 4K Write 42.7 4K Mixed 43.2 144% 43.2 MB/s	DQ Read 440 DQ Write 406 DQ Mixed 406 309% 417 MB/s
Poor: 37% Great: 78%
Msft Virtual Disk 977GB 441GB free Firmware: 1.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 850 813 813 814 814 813 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples

Msft Virtual Disk 1TB 59GB free Firmware: 1.0 Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	Read 2,397 Write 2328 Mixed 2,392 530% 2,372 MB/s	4K Read 44.7 4K Write 43.9 4K Mixed 44.2 148% 44.3 MB/s	DQ Read 440 DQ Write 405 DQ Mixed 407 310% 418 MB/s

Msft Virtual Disk 107GB 19 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 12GB free Firmware: 1.0 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 2,409 Write 2,372 Mixed 2,388 534% 2,390 MB/s	4K Read 44.8 4K Write 43.8 4K Mixed 43.7 147% 44.1 MB/s	DQ Read 444 DQ Write 408 DQ Mixed 409 312% 420 MB/s
Poor: 41% Great: 85%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 62GB 50 User benchmarks, average bench 76% null MHz 3968, 32767, 27265 MB Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	135% Outstanding	MC Read 61.2 MC Write 53.4 MC Mixed 51 158% 55.2 GB/s	SC Read 11.3 SC Write 15.9 SC Mixed 16.9 42% 14.7 GB/s	Latency 90.1 44% 90.1 ns
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 135% Great: 135%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	1,322x
SVGA 3DVmwareBench 20%, 11,474 samples	1,147x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	1,061x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	830x
Virtual NVMe Disk 64GBVmwareBench 62%, 2,103 samples	458x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	433x

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $325