Asus M5A97 LE R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics7.16% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive66.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus M5A97 LE R2.0  (all builds)
Memory4.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150324
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateOct 13 '17 at 05:34
Run Duration381 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-6300-$90
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
61.1% Good
Memory 83.5
1-Core 69.8
2-Core 129
58% 94.1 Pts
4-Core 214
8-Core 284
32% 250 Pts
64-Core 286
18% 286 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 61.1%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6670
Sapphire(174B E195) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
7.16% Terrible
Lighting 9.13
Reflection 8.96
Parallax 7.22
7% 8.44 fps
MRender 8.52
Gravity 6.53
Splatting 8.87
7% 7.98 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 7.16%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85
85GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0BB0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
66.4% Good
Read 466
Write 281
Mixed 304
77% 350 MB/s
4K Read 35.2
4K Write 48.7
4K Mixed 15.7
99% 33.2 MB/s
DQ Read 34
DQ Write 48.8
DQ Mixed 14.4
18% 32.4 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 66.4%
Great: 108%
Spcc Solid State Disk 120GB
37GB free
Firmware: SBFM71.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
52.1% Above average
Read 297
Write 332
Mixed 404
77% 344 MB/s
4K Read 25
4K Write 48.1
4K Mixed 1.96
66% 25 MB/s
DQ Read 26.4
DQ Write 70.9
DQ Mixed 6.87
17% 34.7 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 52.1%
Great: 83%
WD WD5000AVDS-63U7B1 500GB
309GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
52% Above average
Read 95.9
Write 85.4
Mixed 80.9
66% 87.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.93
4K Mixed 0.23
56% 0.49 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 52%
Great: 52%
WD WD3200KS-00PFB0 320GB
288GB free
Firmware: 21.00M21 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
25.8% Poor
Read 43.9
Write 45.2
Mixed 44
34% 44.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.69
4K Write 2.23
4K Mixed 0.45
120% 1.12 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 25.8%
Great: 36%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$32
189GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
78.5% Very good
Read 142
Write 132
Mixed 134
102% 136 MB/s
4K Read 0.62
4K Write 2.27
4K Mixed 0.21
91% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 78.5%
Great: 109%
USB DISK 2.0 4GB
0GB free, PID 3600
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
5.74% Terrible
Read 19.2
Write 6.48
Mixed 8.38
12% 11.3 MB/s
4K Read 5.99
4K Write 0.04
4K Mixed 0.04
25% 2.03 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.74%
Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata DDR3 1600G Corsair VS2GB1333D3 DDR3 1600G 8GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
43% Average
MC Read 16.7
MC Write 13.6
MC Mixed 15.1
43% 15.1 GB/s
SC Read 9.8
SC Write 8.5
SC Mixed 12.4
29% 10.2 GB/s
Latency 74.3
54% 74.3 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 43%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A97 LE R2.0 Builds (Compare 1,460 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus M5A97 LE R2.0 - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 81% - Excellent Total price: $377
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80Nvidia RTX 4070 $542Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback