Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (89th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 11 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	3.51% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2500 82,538 User benchmarks, average bench 63% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	76.4% Very good	Memory 91.8 1-Core 92.8 2-Core 182 72% 122 Pts	4-Core 354 8-Core 347 47% 351 Pts	64-Core 353 22% 353 Pts
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 76.4% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 630 60,212 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Device(7377 0000) 1GB CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 250 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 347.09 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	3.51% Terrible	Lighting 4.3 Reflection 7.2 Parallax 1.9 4% 4.47 fps	MRender 4.5 Gravity 5 Splatting 3.7 4% 4.4 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.51% Great: 5%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Ccboot iSCSI 161GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 19GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0 Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples		Read 5,906 Write 5,305 Mixed 5,655 1,255% 5,622 MB/s	4K Read 372 4K Write 334 4K Mixed 342 1,178% 349 MB/s	DQ Read 455 DQ Write 556 DQ Mixed 521 389% 511 MB/s
Poor: 12% Great: 19%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B5673FH0-CH9 M378B5773DH0-CH9 M378B5773DH0-CH9 M378B5773DH0-CH9 8GB 14 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	52.2% Above average	MC Read 17.7 MC Write 19.1 MC Mixed 16.4 51% 17.7 GB/s	SC Read 14.4 SC Write 17.1 SC Mixed 16 45% 15.8 GB/s	Latency 64.4 62% 64.4 ns
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 52.2% Great: 52%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 24%

Surfboard

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 20%

Surfboard

SSD
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	7x
PLUS 240GBSandiskBench 45%, 86,316 samples	4x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	4x

RAM
RM25664BA1339.8FD Samsung M378B5173QH0-CK0 RM25664BA1339.8FD Corsair CMV4GX3M1A1333C9 12GBUnknownBench 49%, 4 samples	4x
ACR16D3LU1KB KHX1600C9D3/ ACR16D3LU1KB KHX1600C9D3/ 16GBKingstonBench 54%, 4 samples	4x
RM25664BA133 029E VS2GB1333D3 859B RM25664BA133 029E VS2GB1333D3 8GBUnknownBench 47%, 3 samples	3x

Value: 72% - Very good

Total price: $394