MSI MPG X570S CARBON MAX WIFI (MS-7D52)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 124%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 136%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 108%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics112% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive521% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (94%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7D52
MotherboardMSI MPG X570S CARBON MAX WIFI (MS-7D52)  (all builds)
Memory48.1 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210907
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateJul 05 '22 at 04:46
Run Duration287 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 94%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X-$249
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Memory 88.4
1-Core 99.1
2-Core 338
90% 175 Pts
4-Core 682
8-Core 1,238
115% 960 Pts
64-Core 2,228
138% 2,228 Pts
Poor: 87%
This bench: 108%
Great: 108%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-Ti-$429
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 516.59
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (144 fps cap detected)
112% Outstanding
Lighting 144
Reflection 144
Parallax 144
117% 144 fps
MRender 144
Gravity 144
Splatting 127
112% 138 fps
Poor: 139%
This bench: 112%
Great: 170%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black SN850 NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$219
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 614600WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4275 4367 3992 1785 1731 1709 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
521% Outstanding
Read 4,256
Write 4,640
Mixed 3,153
SusWrite 2,976
845% 3,756 MB/s
4K Read 70.8
4K Write 234
4K Mixed 94.5
352% 133 MB/s
DQ Read 1,561
DQ Write 1,208
DQ Mixed 1,334
1,012% 1,368 MB/s
Poor: 280%
This bench: 521%
Great: 634%
Samsung 870 EVO 4TB-$371
3.5TB free
Firmware: SVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 459 444 456 461 460 460 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 491
Write 442
Mixed 364
SusWrite 457
99% 438 MB/s
4K Read 33.4
4K Write 92.2
4K Mixed 44.9
157% 56.8 MB/s
DQ Read 243
DQ Write 196
DQ Mixed 199
154% 213 MB/s
Poor: 90%
This bench: 106%
Great: 137%
Samsung 870 EVO 2TB-$192
1TB free
Firmware: SVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 460 442 456 461 460 460 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
119% Outstanding
Read 505
Write 453
Mixed 442
SusWrite 456
104% 464 MB/s
4K Read 45.7
4K Write 95.1
4K Mixed 60
196% 66.9 MB/s
DQ Read 244
DQ Write 196
DQ Mixed 216
163% 219 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 119%
Great: 136%
Samsung 870 EVO 4TB-$371
3TB free
Firmware: SVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 460 445 456 461 461 461 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
118% Outstanding
Read 492
Write 440
Mixed 432
SusWrite 457
103% 455 MB/s
4K Read 44.7
4K Write 94.9
4K Mixed 60
195% 66.5 MB/s
DQ Read 243
DQ Write 197
DQ Mixed 217
163% 219 MB/s
Poor: 90%
This bench: 118%
Great: 137%
SanDisk Cruzer Glide 16GB
7GB free, PID 5575
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.5 5.8 4.6 4.5 4.6 4.7 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
9.68% Terrible
Read 34.9
Write 7.2
Mixed 5.7
SusWrite 4.7
13% 13.1 MB/s
4K Read 4.8
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 2.6
133% 2.73 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 9.68%
Great: 17%
Generic MassStorageClass 32GB
16GB free, PID 0749
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 31 32 32 32 32 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
22.7% Poor
Read 39
Write 35.4
Mixed 32.6
SusWrite 32
47% 34.8 MB/s
4K Read 6.2
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 3.8
248% 4.27 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 22.7%
Great: 37%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMK32GX4M2B3200C16 F4-3200C16-16GVK CMK32GX4M2B3200C16 F4-3200C16-16GVK 64GB
3200, 3200, 3200, 3200 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
111% Outstanding
MC Read 48.3
MC Write 37.8
MC Mixed 35.8
116% 40.6 GB/s
SC Read 30.6
SC Write 23.7
SC Mixed 39.3
89% 31.2 GB/s
Latency 69.2
58% 69.2 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 111%
Great: 111%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MPG X570S CARBON MAX WIFI (MS-7D52) Builds (Compare 798 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 199%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 218%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MPG X570S CARBON MAX WIFI (MS-7D52)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $1,019
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback