Asrock X99 WS-E/10G

Performance Results


Gaming 30% Raft	Desktop 73% Battleship	Workstation 26% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	32% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	152% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

22 months ago, 22 months ago.

Motherboard	Asrock X99 WS-E/10G (all builds)
Memory	73.6 GB free of 128 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180406
Uptime	1.1 Days
Run Date	Jul 05 '22 at 20:06
Run Duration	305 Seconds
Run User	HUN-User
Background CPU	100%

PC Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-1650 v3 7,962 User benchmarks, average bench 77% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	65% Good	Memory 76 1-Core 72.6 2-Core 146 58% 98.2 Pts	4-Core 292 8-Core 438 45% 365 Pts	64-Core 529 33% 529 Pts
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 65% Great: 83%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro M4000 9,043 User benchmarks, average bench 32% Nvidia(10DE 1153) ≥ 4GB CLim: 772 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 516.25 Performing below potential (72^nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	32% Below average	Lighting 38.3 Reflection 41.2 Parallax 36.6 31% 38.7 fps	MRender 49.6 Gravity 36.4 Splatting 38.5 34% 41.5 fps
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 32% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Nvme Samsung SSD 970 2TB 10,220 User benchmarks, average bench 331% 233GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 412 404 416 415 422 423 MB/s Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	152% Outstanding	Read 1,245 Write 1,093 Mixed 1,026 SusWrite 415 211% 944 MB/s	4K Read 40.2 4K Write 88.5 4K Mixed 54.6 178% 61.1 MB/s	DQ Read 564 DQ Write 415 DQ Mixed 510 376% 496 MB/s
Poor: 221% ↑ This bench: 152% Great: 431%
Samsung 850 Pro 1TB-$210 25,365 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 93GB free Firmware: EXM04B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 105 110 107 109 109 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	63.1% Good	Read 395 Write 299 Mixed 305 SusWrite 107 62% 277 MB/s	4K Read 26.4 4K Write 58.2 4K Mixed 37.3 119% 40.6 MB/s	DQ Read 37 DQ Write 117 DQ Mixed 51.9 47% 68.5 MB/s
Poor: 77% ↑ This bench: 63.1% Great: 124%
WD Black 6TB (2015)-$284 5,447 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 2TB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 95 92 96 95 97 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	46.8% Average	Read 67.3 Write 192 Mixed 56.9 SusWrite 93.8 75% 103 MB/s	4K Read 4.5 4K Write 2.8 4K Mixed 1 350% 2.77 MB/s
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 46.8% Great: 118%
WD Black 6TB (2015)-$284 5,447 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 475GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 106 110 108 109 110 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	63.2% Good	Read 111 Write 135 Mixed 92.7 SusWrite 108 82% 112 MB/s	4K Read 2.9 4K Write 3.2 4K Mixed 1.1 302% 2.4 MB/s
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 63.2% Great: 118%
WD Red 6TB (2014)-$129 11,340 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 670GB free Firmware: 82.00A82 SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 95 92 95 96 96 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	51.2% Above average	Read 84.3 Write 93.8 Mixed 70.4 SusWrite 93.7 63% 85.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.8 4K Mixed 0.9 181% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 51.2% Great: 99%
WD Black 6TB (2015)-$284 5,447 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 202GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 136 136 136 136 134 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	59.1% Above average	Read 68.7 Write 149 Mixed 93.2 SusWrite 136 83% 112 MB/s	4K Read 3.4 4K Write 2.9 4K Mixed 1 306% 2.43 MB/s
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 59.1% Great: 118%
WD Black 6TB (2015)-$284 5,447 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 3.5TB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 182 185 194 192 195 196 MB/s Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	109% Outstanding	Read 189 Write 186 Mixed 114 SusWrite 190 125% 170 MB/s	4K Read 4.7 4K Write 3.2 4K Mixed 0.9 355% 2.93 MB/s
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 109% Great: 118%
Lexar JumpDrive S25 USB 3.0 32GB-$13 3,792 User benchmarks, average bench 21% 0GB free, PID a838 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 17 Write 15.4 Mixed 2.7 13% 11.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.1 4K Write 0.1 4K Mixed 0.1 7% 0.1 MB/s
Poor: 9% Great: 33%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Dominator DDR4 2400 C14 8x16GB 24 User benchmarks, average bench 120% 8 of 8 slots used 128GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	94.1% Outstanding	MC Read 32.8 MC Write 42.7 MC Mixed 36.7 107% 37.4 GB/s	SC Read 10.1 SC Write 16.2 SC Mixed 14.6 39% 13.6 GB/s	Latency 88.4 45% 88.4 ns
Poor: 94% ↑ This bench: 94.1% Great: 137%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X99 WS-E/10G Builds (Compare 12 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 89%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 89%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 86%

Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asrock X99 WS-E/10G

CPU
Core i7-5960XIntel $285Bench 80%, 15,468 samples	3x
Core i7-5930KIntel $150Bench 80%, 34,039 samples	3x
Xeon E5-2630 v4IntelBench 63%, 1,239 samples	2x

GPU
RTX 2070Nvidia $200Bench 104%, 478,117 samples	4x
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	2x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	2x

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $159Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	4x
TM8FP6512G 512GBTeamBench 195%, 6,771 samples	2x
RAIDR Express PCIeAsusBench 86%, 1,224 samples	1x

RAM
CT16G4DFD8213.M16FA 8x16GBCrucialBench 111%, 4 samples	3x
36ASF2G72PZ-2G1A2 4x16GBMicronBench 92%, 577 samples	1x
Dominator DDR4 2666 C15 4x8GBCorsairBench 91%, 1,076 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 93% - Outstanding

Total price: $644

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $289	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $168	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Asrock X99 WS-E/10G

Performance Results

Run History

PC Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Asrock X99 WS-E/10G

Feedback

PC Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)