Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-AB350M-Gaming 3-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 33%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics26.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive39.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemGigabyte AB350M-Gaming 3
MotherboardGigabyte GA-AB350M-Gaming 3-CF  (all builds)
Memory10.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200702
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 09 '22 at 23:07
Run Duration266 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 14%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 1500X-$111
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
33% Below average
Memory 49.2
1-Core 49.1
2-Core 87.8
38% 62 Pts
4-Core 104
8-Core 76.1
13% 90 Pts
64-Core 78.1
5% 78.1 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 33%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Gigabyte(1458 3763) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 516.59
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
26.2% Poor
Lighting 32
Reflection 38.3
Parallax 37.7
26% 36 fps
MRender 36.7
Gravity 36.8
Splatting 26.4
26% 33.3 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 26.2%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk SSD Plus 240GB-$27
37GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z33130RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 51 51 89 45 38 MB/s
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
39.7% Below average
Read 94.9
Write 201
Mixed 190
SusWrite 63.6
31% 138 MB/s
4K Read 14.2
4K Write 67.9
4K Mixed 14.6
76% 32.2 MB/s
DQ Read 166
DQ Write 263
DQ Mixed 7
64% 145 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 39.7%
Great: 86%
Seagate Basic 1TB
43GB free
Firmware: 9340
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 89 90 90 90 89 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
37.7% Below average
Read 42.9
Write 54
Mixed 63.2
SusWrite 88.4
46% 62.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.2
76% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 37.7%
Great: 69%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$36
402GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 142 146 146 147 149 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
99.4% Outstanding
Read 203
Write 197
Mixed 84.1
SusWrite 144
115% 157 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.9
163% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 99.4%
Great: 113%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$54
42GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 114 117 123 122 160 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
79.3% Very good
Read 150
Write 138
Mixed 80.5
SusWrite 126
91% 124 MB/s
4K Read 2.1
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0
99% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 79.3%
Great: 106%
WD 5000BEV External 500GB
335GB free, PID 1010
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 33 33 34 33 34 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
17.2% Very poor
Read 36
Write 25
Mixed 25.1
SusWrite 33.4
40% 29.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
77% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 17.2%
Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C14 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
49.2% Average
MC Read 19.5
MC Write 19.8
MC Mixed 17.9
54% 19.1 GB/s
SC Read 10.2
SC Write 10
SC Mixed 8
27% 9.4 GB/s
Latency 164
24% 164 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 49.2%
Great: 89%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-AB350M-Gaming 3-CF Builds (Compare 1,306 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 46%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AB350M-Gaming 3-CF - $150

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $516
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $330
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback