Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-X399 AORUS PRO-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 58%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 67%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics84.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemGigabyte X399 AORUS PRO
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X399 AORUS PRO-CF  (all builds)
Memory23.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190309
Uptime9.4 Days
Run DateJul 12 '22 at 16:24
Run Duration226 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 24%
Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen TR 1920X-$800
SP3r2, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
67.3% Good
Memory 52.3
1-Core 116
2-Core 231
70% 133 Pts
4-Core 440
8-Core 790
74% 615 Pts
64-Core 1,679
104% 1,679 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 67.3%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$140
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 512.59
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
84.8% Excellent
Lighting 105
Reflection 98.5
Parallax 102
86% 102 fps
MRender 126
Gravity 97.1
Splatting 87.6
83% 103 fps
Poor: 80%
This bench: 84.8%
Great: 97%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$30
19GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK61K1
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 447
Write 364
Mixed 320
84% 377 MB/s
4K Read 28.7
4K Write 63
4K Mixed 27.7
112% 39.8 MB/s
DQ Read 237
DQ Write 249
DQ Mixed 54.3
93% 180 MB/s
Poor: 33% Great: 85%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
103GB free
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 429 371 364 366 367 367 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 483
Write 450
Mixed 416
SusWrite 378
97% 431 MB/s
4K Read 37.5
4K Write 69.3
4K Mixed 47.9
155% 51.6 MB/s
DQ Read 379
DQ Write 352
DQ Mixed 362
273% 364 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 107%
Great: 129%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$30
423GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 160 165 161 162 160 163 MB/s
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
95.4% Outstanding
Read 171
Write 179
Mixed 86.2
SusWrite 162
109% 150 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
141% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 95.4%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMK16GX4M4C3000C16 TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 CMK16GX4M4C3000C16 CMK16GX4M4C3000C16 TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 CMK16GX4M4C3000C16 32GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
4096, 8192, 4096, 4096, 8192, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
43% Average
MC Read 16.2
MC Write 13.7
MC Mixed 14.7
42% 14.9 GB/s
SC Read 15.7
SC Write 15.6
SC Mixed 15.8
45% 15.7 GB/s
Latency 152
26% 152 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 31: 2R 5G 6B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
31% 10% 135 297 226 144 24.5" 1920 1080 HPN357E HP 25x
History: Score 38: 3R 6G 5B | Score 31: 2R 5G 6B
Typical GA-X399 AORUS PRO-CF Builds (Compare 263 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 94%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 104%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X399 AORUS PRO-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $1,269
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback