Gigabyte GA-H110M-S2PT-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 35%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 38%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.97% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive64.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemGigabyte H110M-S2PT
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H110M-S2PT-CF  (all builds)
Memory3.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161116
Uptime1.3 Days
Run DateJul 13 '22 at 12:06
Run Duration185 Seconds
Run User IRN-User
Background CPU 28%

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-7100-$40
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
38% Below average
Memory 53.2
1-Core 34.2
2-Core 53
32% 46.8 Pts
4-Core 124
8-Core 230
21% 177 Pts
64-Core 297
18% 297 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 38%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 5450
XFX(1682 3030) 2GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1002
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.97% Terrible
Lighting 1.2
Reflection 2.1
Parallax 1.6
1% 1.63 fps
MRender 1.6
Gravity 0.5
Splatting 1.4
1% 1.17 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.97%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 870 Evo 250GB-$45
124GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 266 293 302 311 297 305 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
64.6% Good
Read 335
Write 320
Mixed 307
SusWrite 296
71% 314 MB/s
4K Read 16.6
4K Write 30.8
4K Mixed 19.6
67% 22.3 MB/s
DQ Read 287
DQ Write 275
DQ Mixed 347
243% 303 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 64.6%
Great: 128%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$39
350GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 181 194 197 199 194 200 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 170
Write 149
Mixed 86.4
SusWrite 194
110% 150 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.9
161% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 104%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown GLLF62F-DA---------- 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
51.7% Above average
MC Read 15.1
MC Write 23.8
MC Mixed 19.7
56% 19.5 GB/s
SC Read 9.8
SC Write 14.7
SC Mixed 11.6
34% 12 GB/s
Latency 149
27% 149 ns
Poor: 52%
This bench: 51.7%
Great: 73%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H110M-S2PT-CF Builds (Compare 174 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H110M-S2PT-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $157
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback