Today's hottest deals

Asus ROG STRIX Z690-F GAMING WIFI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 210%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 105%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 218%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 109%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics197% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive84.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 91% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX Z690-F GAMING WIFI  (all builds)
Memory26.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210825
Uptime3.4 Days
Run DateJul 13 '22 at 16:09
Run Duration227 Seconds
Run User KAZ-User
Background CPU4%
CPU Throttled 91%
Watch Gameplay: 3080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-12600K-$165
LGA1700, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
109% Outstanding
Memory 72.9
1-Core 190
2-Core 392
112% 218 Pts
4-Core 780
8-Core 1,349
129% 1,064 Pts
64-Core 1,770
110% 1,770 Pts
Poor: 100%
This bench: 109%
Great: 117%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-$700
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 511.79
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
197% Outstanding
Lighting 290
Reflection 253
Parallax 294
236% 279 fps
MRender 310
Gravity 244
Splatting 177
192% 244 fps
Poor: 163%
This bench: 197%
Great: 202%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
116GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 198 225 222 221 220 219 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
84.7% Excellent
Read 426
Write 211
Mixed 234
SusWrite 217
60% 272 MB/s
4K Read 26.5
4K Write 110
4K Mixed 29.3
136% 55.4 MB/s
DQ Read 364
DQ Write 251
DQ Mixed 206
181% 273 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 84.7%
Great: 129%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
99GB free
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 293 448 466 474 483 459 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
130% Outstanding
Read 511
Write 481
Mixed 455
SusWrite 437
106% 471 MB/s
4K Read 46.5
4K Write 127
4K Mixed 62.9
218% 78.8 MB/s
DQ Read 369
DQ Write 316
DQ Mixed 338
254% 341 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 130%
Great: 133%
WDC WD40EZAZ-22SF3B0 4TB
2TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 146 162 161 163 162 162 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
20% Very poor
Read 122
Write 128
Mixed 66.3
SusWrite 160
27% 119 MB/s
4K Read 8.5
4K Write 8.5
4K Mixed 0.8
18% 5.93 MB/s
DQ Read 1
DQ Write 13.8
DQ Mixed 2.2
3% 5.67 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 20%
Great: 39%
Samsung 870 QVO 1TB-$112
528GB free
Firmware: SVQ02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 161 236 242 246 252 254 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
84.6% Excellent
Read 339
Write 375
Mixed 348
SusWrite 232
73% 323 MB/s
4K Read 34
4K Write 89.2
4K Mixed 41.6
152% 54.9 MB/s
DQ Read 253
DQ Write 194
DQ Mixed 226
169% 225 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 84.6%
Great: 128%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$67
765GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 95 95 96 94 94 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
52.9% Above average
Read 90
Write 88.2
Mixed 62
SusWrite 94
62% 83.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.8
164% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 52.9%
Great: 84%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$67
153GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 83 84 82 83 84 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
47.5% Average
Read 81.7
Write 92.7
Mixed 68.7
SusWrite 83.2
60% 81.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.8
162% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 47.5%
Great: 84%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair K32GX5M2A4800C40 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
87.2% Excellent
MC Read 33.8
MC Write 33
MC Mixed 30.4
93% 32.4 GB/s
SC Read 16.9
SC Write 29.5
SC Mixed 23.2
66% 23.2 GB/s
Latency 94.8
42% 94.8 ns
Poor: 87%
This bench: 87.2%
Great: 160%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG STRIX Z690-F GAMING WIFI Builds (Compare 5,425 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 232%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 116%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 273%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX Z690-F GAMING WIFI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 105% - Outstanding Total price: $1,157
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback