Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-X3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics4.64% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive122% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X3  (all builds)
Memory9.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140704
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 18 '22 at 09:09
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User LTU-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4860HQ
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
67% Good
Memory 77.1
1-Core 88
2-Core 166
64% 110 Pts
4-Core 308
8-Core 444
47% 376 Pts
64-Core 452
28% 452 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 67%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Pro HD 5200 (V2 Mobile 1.2 GHz)
Gigabyte(1458 1456) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5171
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
4.64% Terrible
Lighting 5.7
Reflection 24.2
Parallax 7.4
5% 12.4 fps
MRender 7.5
Gravity 3.5
Splatting 6
5% 5.67 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.64%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Raid 0 Volume 512GB
158GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 608 569 645 586 593 635 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
122% Outstanding
Read 916
Write 614
Mixed 380
SusWrite 606
140% 629 MB/s
4K Read 25.1
4K Write 52.7
4K Mixed 26.3
100% 34.7 MB/s
DQ Read 391
DQ Write 408
DQ Mixed 350
277% 383 MB/s
Poor: 82%
This bench: 122%
Great: 332%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Transcend TS1GSK64W6H 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
67.8% Good
MC Read 34.5
MC Write 20.7
MC Mixed 19.7
71% 25 GB/s
SC Read 13.9
SC Write 17.9
SC Mixed 18.8
48% 16.9 GB/s
Latency 86.2
46% 86.2 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 67.8%
Great: 68%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X3 Builds (Compare 12 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback