Monster ABRA A5 V17.2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 68%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 64%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (92nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 8 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics70.3% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive231% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemMonster ABRA A5 V17.2  (all builds)
MotherboardMONSTER ABRA A5 V17.2
Memory10.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211206
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJul 18 '22 at 23:28
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-11400H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
87.3% Excellent
Memory 70.3
1-Core 159
2-Core 318
96% 182 Pts
4-Core 559
8-Core 849
87% 704 Pts
64-Core 1,074
66% 1,074 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 87.3%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3050-Ti (Laptop)
Clevo(1558 5015) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.1659
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
70.3% Very good
Lighting 94.8
Reflection 86.2
Parallax 83.4
77% 88.1 fps
MRender 75.7
Gravity 69.1
Splatting 65.2
57% 70 fps
Poor: 42%
This bench: 70.3%
Great: 72%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial P2 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$55
294GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P2CR048 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1856 1861 566 12 340 475 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
231% Outstanding
Read 1,186
Write 1858
Mixed 1,379
SusWrite 852
298% 1,319 MB/s
4K Read 51.4
4K Write 205
4K Mixed 79.8
289% 112 MB/s
DQ Read 1031
DQ Write 888
DQ Mixed 1076
774% 998 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 231%
Great: 253%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4SFRA32A.C8FN CT8G4SFRA32A.C8FR 16GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
99.1% Outstanding
MC Read 39
MC Write 39.8
MC Mixed 32.6
106% 37.1 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 42.5
SC Mixed 18.8
75% 26.1 GB/s
Latency 101
40% 101 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 99.1%
Great: 99%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ABRA A5 V17.2 Builds (Compare 975 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Monster ABRA A5 V17.2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $55
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback