QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 77%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 67%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics96.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive32.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (51%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemQEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory8.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150206
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 19 '22 at 03:02
Run Duration165 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 51%
Watch Gameplay: 5700-XT + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT 6-Core
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
76.8% Very good
Memory 73.4
1-Core 113
2-Core 234
77% 140 Pts
4-Core 431
8-Core 672
68% 552 Pts
64-Core 626
39% 626 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 76.8%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 5700-XT-$150
MSI(1462 3810) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.6.1
Performing below potential (36th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
96.5% Outstanding
Lighting 122
Reflection 139
Parallax 186
99% 149 fps
MRender 113
Gravity 137
Splatting 92.4
92% 114 fps
Poor: 91%
This bench: 96.5%
Great: 104%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Qemu HARDDISK 512GB
85GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.5+
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 22 54 18 7.7 44 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
32.2% Below average
Read 242
Write 336
Mixed 124
SusWrite 43.1
42% 186 MB/s
4K Read 13.6
4K Write 32.9
4K Mixed 11
52% 19.2 MB/s
DQ Read 83.3
DQ Write 115
DQ Mixed 101
76% 99.6 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 32.2%
Great: 66%
Qemu HARDDISK 2TB
1TB free
Firmware: 2.5+
SusWrite @10s intervals: 153 158 156 154 142 156 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
15.2% Very poor
Read 128
Write 122
Mixed 75.5
SusWrite 153
27% 119 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.1
3% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 15.2%
Great: 80%
Qemu HARDDISK 2TB
169GB free
Firmware: 2.5+
SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 36 57 44 34 35 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
4.09% Terrible
Read 28.3
Write 47.3
Mixed 44.2
SusWrite 41.1
9% 40.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.3
2% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 4.09%
Great: 80%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
QEMU 1x16GB
1 of 1 slots used
16GB DIMM RAM
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
85.5% Excellent
MC Read 36.8
MC Write 22.5
MC Mixed 36.7
91% 32 GB/s
SC Read 18.1
SC Write 19.9
SC Mixed 26.5
61% 21.5 GB/s
Latency 93.8
43% 93.8 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 85.5%
Great: 161%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009) Builds (Compare 612 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship

System: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 84% - Excellent Total price: $350
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $250WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback