bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (95th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 5 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics60.2% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced. Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemVMware, VMware Virtual Platform
MotherboardIntel 440BX Desktop Reference Platform
Memory2.7 GB free of 4 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20150702
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 16 '17 at 20:12
Run Duration84 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Core i5-4690K
CPU #000, 2 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
84.5% Excellent
Memory 80.1
1-Core 133
2-Core 262
86% 158 Pts
4-Core 511
8-Core 518
69% 514 Pts
64-Core 518
32% 518 Pts
Poor: 82%
This bench: 84.5%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Vmware SVGA 3D
Vmware(15AD 0405) 1GB
Driver: vm3dum64.dll Ver. 8.15.1.33
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
60.2% Good
Lighting 58.9
Reflection 69.7
Parallax 134
48% 87.4 fps
MRender 97.9
Gravity 117
Splatting 94.7
84% 103 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 60.2%
Great: 69%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Vmware, VMware Virtual S 64GB
47GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
90.7% Outstanding
Read 164
Write 152
Mixed 127
111% 148 MB/s
4K Read 0.67
4K Write 1.61
4K Mixed 0.27
88% 0.85 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 90.7%
Great: 91%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x4GB
1 of 128 slots used
4GB DIMM DRAM
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
79.3% Very good
MC Read 28.2
MC Write 33.2
MC Mixed 27.3
84% 29.6 GB/s
SC Read 14.6
SC Write 20.9
SC Mixed 20.9
54% 18.8 GB/s
Latency 80.3
50% 80.3 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 79.3%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,498 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback