Today's hottest deals

Monster ABRA A5 V15.7

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics5.82% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive119% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemMonster ABRA A5 V15.7  (all builds)
MotherboardMONSTER ABRA A5 V15.7
Memory7.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200804
Uptime5.9 Days
Run DateJul 26 '22 at 17:41
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10300H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
59.7% Above average
Memory 67.3
1-Core 108
2-Core 200
70% 125 Pts
4-Core 282
8-Core 399
43% 341 Pts
64-Core 406
25% 406 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 59.7%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Device(1D05 1099) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.100.9805
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
5.82% Terrible
Lighting 6.3
Reflection 63.1
Parallax 7.8
5% 25.7 fps
MRender 9.4
Gravity 6
Splatting 10.3
7% 8.57 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.82%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue SN550 NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB
90GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 211070WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 306 215 155 133 127 119 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
119% Outstanding
Read 964
Write 741
Mixed 704
SusWrite 176
144% 646 MB/s
4K Read 27.3
4K Write 92
4K Mixed 39.8
141% 53 MB/s
DQ Read 618
DQ Write 541
DQ Mixed 546
418% 568 MB/s
Poor: 119%
This bench: 119%
Great: 199%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4ATF1G64HZ-3G2E1 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
49.1% Average
MC Read 16.7
MC Write 19.5
MC Mixed 17.5
51% 17.9 GB/s
SC Read 10.8
SC Write 14.8
SC Mixed 11.9
36% 12.5 GB/s
Latency 108
37% 108 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 49.1%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ABRA A5 V15.7 Builds (Compare 150 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Monster ABRA A5 V15.7

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback