HP 250 G6 Notebook PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics4.28% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive82% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
22 months ago, 22 months ago.
SystemHP 250 G6 Notebook PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8328
Memory4.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190304
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 27 '22 at 15:55
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-6006U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
48.4% Average
Memory 68.2
1-Core 60.5
2-Core 97.3
48% 75.3 Pts
4-Core 169
8-Core 164
22% 167 Pts
64-Core 160
10% 160 Pts
Poor: 15%
This bench: 48.4%
Great: 49%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 520 (Mobile Skylake)
HP(103C 8328) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7925
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
4.28% Terrible
Lighting 4.5
Reflection 3.9
Parallax 5.6
4% 4.67 fps
MRender 6.7
Gravity 4.8
Splatting 8
6% 6.5 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.28%
Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZNLN256HMHQ-000H1 256GB
94GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MAV21H3Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 305 252 298 218 187 180 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
82% Excellent
Read 419
Write 390
Mixed 346
SusWrite 240
78% 349 MB/s
4K Read 27.4
4K Write 46.9
4K Mixed 35.8
112% 36.7 MB/s
DQ Read 376
DQ Write 316
DQ Mixed 341
257% 344 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 82%
Great: 115%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HP26D4S9S1ME-4 859B CT4G4SFS6266.C4FJ 8GB
2133, 2133 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
61.5% Good
MC Read 19.9
MC Write 26.1
MC Mixed 20.7
64% 22.2 GB/s
SC Read 11.2
SC Write 24.6
SC Mixed 18.4
52% 18.1 GB/s
Latency 106
38% 106 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 61.5%
Great: 70%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 250 G6 Notebook PC Builds (Compare 1,881 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: HP 250 G6 Notebook PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback