AZW MINI S

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics1.73% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive35.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAZW MINI S  (all builds)
MotherboardAZW MINI S
Memory4.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220413
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJul 27 '22 at 20:57
Run Duration290 Seconds
Run User ARE-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron N5095
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
57.7% Above average
Memory 64.3
1-Core 76.7
2-Core 151
56% 97.4 Pts
4-Core 296
8-Core 295
40% 296 Pts
64-Core 291
18% 291 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 57.7%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Intel(8086 2212) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1340
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
1.73% Terrible
Lighting 3
Reflection 4
Parallax 3.5
2% 3.5 fps
MRender 0.2
Gravity 1
Splatting 0.1
0% 0.43 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.73%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Ngff 2280 128GB SSD
81GB free (System drive)
Firmware: U0510A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 308 42 28 38 43 42 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
35.8% Below average
Read 281
Write 315
Mixed 41.5
SusWrite 83.6
40% 180 MB/s
4K Read 9.5
4K Write 49.5
4K Mixed 0.4
41% 19.8 MB/s
DQ Read 73.7
DQ Write 306
DQ Mixed 0.4
56% 127 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 35.8%
Great: 83%
USB SanDisk 3.2Gen1 123GB
41GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 32 33 33 33 34 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
30.6% Below average
Read 124
Write 32
Mixed 58.4
SusWrite 32.7
70% 61.7 MB/s
4K Read 4
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 1.5
117% 2.33 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 30.6%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown DDR4 NB 8G 2666 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
44.1% Average
MC Read 15.7
MC Write 18.1
MC Mixed 14.1
46% 16 GB/s
SC Read 8.5
SC Write 12.1
SC Mixed 14.5
33% 11.7 GB/s
Latency 116
35% 116 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 44.1%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MINI S Builds (Compare 479 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: AZW MINI S

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback