Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 28% Raft	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 24.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	3.06% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	44.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (85%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron N5100 996 User benchmarks, average bench 34% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)	24.8% Poor	Memory 13.5 1-Core 64.7 2-Core 124 33% 67.4 Pts	4-Core 202 8-Core 233 28% 218 Pts	64-Core 231 14% 231 Pts
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 24.8% Great: 47%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 2,226 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Intel(8086 2212) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.1999 Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	3.06% Terrible	Lighting 4.3 Reflection 4.2 Parallax 4.8 4% 4.43 fps	MRender 4.8 Gravity 4.2 Splatting 0.2 2% 3.07 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.06% Great: 4%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Ngff 2280 128GB SSD 244 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 87GB free (System drive) Firmware: V0414A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 287 120 110 108 121 120 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	44.2% Average	Read 337 Write 269 Mixed 292 SusWrite 144 58% 261 MB/s	4K Read 12.4 4K Write 24.6 4K Mixed 12.8 48% 16.6 MB/s	DQ Read 122 DQ Write 202 DQ Mixed 49.4 69% 125 MB/s
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 44.2% Great: 83%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown DDR4 NB 8G 2666 1x8GB 240 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	18.4% Very poor	MC Read 6 MC Write 9.2 MC Mixed 5.7 20% 6.97 GB/s	SC Read 2.5 SC Write 5.2 SC Mixed 4.3 11% 4 GB/s	Latency 372 11% 372 ns
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 18.4% Great: 44%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 38%

Jet ski

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

CPU
Celeron N5100IntelBench 34%, 996 samples	25x
Celeron N5095AIntelBench 40%, 431 samples	13x
Celeron N5095IntelBench 43%, 1,699 samples	9x

GPU
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 4%, 2,226 samples	25x
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 2%, 4,536 samples	22x

RAM
WPBH26D416SXA-16G 1x16GBUnknownBench 27%, 47 samples	21x
DDR4 NB 8G 2666 1x8GBUnknownBench 33%, 240 samples	18x
1x16GBUnknownBench 53%, 15,722 samples	2x