TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asus G750JS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics4.15% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive122% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
SystemAsus G750JS  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK G750JS
Memory13.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit väriä
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20140717
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 30 '22 at 07:05
Run Duration153 Seconds
Run User FIN-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4700HQ-$370
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
75.6% Very good
Memory 84.9
1-Core 96.8
2-Core 188
72% 123 Pts
4-Core 363
8-Core 493
54% 428 Pts
64-Core 491
30% 491 Pts
Poor: 40% ↑
This bench: 75.6%
 Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)
Asus(1043 157D) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.3308
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
4.15% Terrible
Lighting 5
Reflection 24.8
Parallax 6.9
4% 12.2 fps
MRender 8.5
Gravity 2.5
Splatting 5.1
4% 5.37 fps
Poor: 2% ↑
This bench: 4.15%
 Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS100T2B0A-00SM50 1TB
318GB free
Firmware: 401000WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 224 246 209 245 226 249 MB/s
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
76.9% Very good
Read 247
Write 120
Mixed 214
SusWrite 233
46% 203 MB/s
4K Read 27.6
4K Write 77.9
4K Mixed 44.5
140% 50 MB/s
DQ Read 197
DQ Write 192
DQ Mixed 187
142% 192 MB/s
Poor: 65% ↑
This bench: 76.9%
 Great: 117%
Samsung 860 Evo 2TB-$235
765GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 464 472 473 467 461 455 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
122% Outstanding
Read 509
Write 481
Mixed 458
SusWrite 466
108% 478 MB/s
4K Read 39.1
4K Write 99.4
4K Mixed 54.8
182% 64.4 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 346
DQ Mixed 360
271% 362 MB/s
Poor: 89% ↑
This bench: 122%
 Great: 133%
Kingston SUV400S37960G 960GB
269GB free
Firmware: 0C3J96R9
SusWrite @10s intervals: 360 450 388 243 149 121 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Poor: 73% Great: 73%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT451S6AFR8A-PB HMT451S6AFR8A-PB HMT451S6BFR8A-PB HMT451S6AFR8A-PB 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
58.3% Above average
MC Read 21.7
MC Write 21.3
MC Mixed 17.5
58% 20.2 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 18.8
SC Mixed 20.3
52% 18.2 GB/s
Latency 72
56% 72 ns
Poor: 42% ↑
This bench: 58.3%
 Great: 58%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical G750JS Builds (Compare 326 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Asus G750JS

CPU
Core i7-4700HQIntel  $370Bench 62%, 42,062 samples210x
Core i7-4710HQIntelBench 58%, 69,536 samples115x
Core i7-4712HQIntelBench 61%, 5,396 samples1x
GPU
HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 258,091 samples208x
GTX 870MNvidiaBench 22%, 3,247 samples118x
SSD
mSATA SD5SE2256G1002E 256GBSanDiskBench 71%, 860 samples26x
X110 256GBSanDisk  $100Bench 79%, 4,989 samples16x
RBU-SC100S37128GD 128GBKingstonBench 58%, 1,846 samples9x
RAM
M471B1G73QH0-YK0 2x8GBSamsungBench 52%, 22,647 samples79x
HMT41GS6AFR8A-PB 2x8GBHynixBench 51%, 18,309 samples26x
M471B5173QH0-YK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 48%, 30,873 samples16x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $370
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products, which UserBenchmark reveals.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback