SPA LCL-508

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics15.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive71.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
23 months ago, 23 months ago.
SystemSPA LCL-508  (all builds)
MotherboardSPA LCL-508
Memory7.4 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180403
Uptime14 Days
Run DateJul 30 '22 at 14:42
Run Duration152 Seconds
Run User DZA-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7400-$70
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
78.4% Very good
Memory 88.3
1-Core 104
2-Core 198
76% 130 Pts
4-Core 395
8-Core 407
53% 401 Pts
64-Core 406
25% 406 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 78.4%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia MX150-0
Clevo(1558 653A) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.1640
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
15.9% Very poor
Lighting 20.3
Reflection 18.6
Parallax 20.9
16% 19.9 fps
MRender 16.2
Gravity 20.8
Splatting 17.3
15% 18.1 fps
Poor: 9%
This bench: 15.9%
Great: 15%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Micron M600 SATA M.2 128GB
25GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MA01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 137 138 143 148 115 79 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
71.7% Very good
Read 428
Write 375
Mixed 200
SusWrite 127
63% 282 MB/s
4K Read 26.5
4K Write 80.7
4K Mixed 33.9
126% 47 MB/s
DQ Read 209
DQ Write 150
DQ Mixed 129
110% 163 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 71.7%
Great: 99%
Seagate ST500LM030-1RK17D 500GB
61GB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 77 78 80 79 79 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
37.6% Below average
Read 51.5
Write 105
Mixed 62.8
SusWrite 78.4
55% 74.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 4.2
4K Mixed 0.6
178% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 37.6%
Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-SD4-2400 Samsung M471A5143EB1-CRC 12GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
60.3% Good
MC Read 22.8
MC Write 22.5
MC Mixed 17.7
60% 21 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 21.8
SC Mixed 18.3
52% 18.1 GB/s
Latency 69.3
58% 69.3 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 60.3%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical LCL-508 Builds (Compare 25 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: SPA LCL-508

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 93% - Outstanding Total price: $70
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback