Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 28% Raft	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 21.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	3.34% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	59.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (81%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

19 months ago, 19 months ago.

PC Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A9-9425 APU (2016 M.SR) 15,014 User benchmarks, average bench 27% P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	21.7% Poor	Memory 33 1-Core 43 2-Core 62.4 28% 46.1 Pts	4-Core 60.6 8-Core 66.8 8% 63.7 Pts	64-Core 62.7 4% 62.7 Pts
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 21.7% Great: 39%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon R5 Graphics 31,419 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Asus(1043 1FE0) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 20.10.35.02 Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)	3.34% Terrible	Lighting 3.8 Reflection 5.1 Parallax 5.7 3% 4.87 fps	MRender 3 Gravity 4.6 Splatting 5.8 4% 4.47 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.34% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Midasfor ce SSD 512GB 11 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 393GB free (System drive) Firmware: V071 SusWrite @10s intervals: 233 226 253 279 314 331 MB/s Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	59.2% Above average	Read 318 Write 273 Mixed 274 SusWrite 273 64% 284 MB/s	4K Read 20.2 4K Write 42.1 4K Mixed 19.2 78% 27.2 MB/s	DQ Read 147 DQ Write 138 DQ Mixed 46.8 62% 111 MB/s
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 59.2% Great: 59%
Seagate ST1000LM 035-1RK172 1TB 3,232 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 849GB free Firmware: SDM2 SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 118 114 113 112 109 MB/s Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	57.6% Above average	Read 87.3 Write 115 Mixed 38.8 SusWrite 113 64% 88.6 MB/s	4K Read 1.6 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.5 161% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 57.6% Great: 70%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-SD4-2400 Samsung M471A5143EB1-CRC 12GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 2400, 2400 MHz 8192, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	17.1% Very poor	MC Read 5.9 MC Write 6.1 MC Mixed 6 17% 6 GB/s	SC Read 3.8 SC Write 4.8 SC Mixed 5.8 14% 4.8 GB/s	Latency 238 17% 238 ns
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 17.1% Great: 60%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 33%

Sail boat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
A4-9125 RADEON R3, 4 COMPUTE CORES 2C+2GAMDBench 29%, 2,523 samples	26x
A9-9425 APU (2016 M.SR)AMDBench 27%, 15,014 samples	23x
A6-9225 RADEON R4, 5 COMPUTE CORES 2C+3GAMDBench 29%, 2,804 samples	19x

GPU
Radeon R5 GraphicsAMDBench 3%, 31,419 samples	37x
Radeon R3 GraphicsAMDBench 2%, 6,360 samples	26x
Radeon R4 GraphicsAMDBench 3%, 13,349 samples	19x

SSD
Micron_1100_MTFDDAK256TBN 256GBBench 78%, 6,868 samples	3x
SU650 240GBAdata $70Bench 70%, 47,016 samples	2x
HFS128G3BTND-N210A 128GBBench 57%, 1,308 samples	2x

RAM
M471A5143EB1-CRC 1x4GBSamsungBench 32%, 1,996 samples	32x
8ATF51264HZ-2G1B1 1x4GBMicronBench 31%, 690 samples	19x
M471A5143EB0-CPB 1x4GBSamsungBench 37%, 7,518 samples	4x