Positivo W540EU

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 41%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics0.47% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
22 months ago, 22 months ago.
SystemPositivo W540EU  (all builds)
MotherboardPositivo W540EU
Memory3.8 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20130315
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 02 '22 at 01:06
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 26%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron B800
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.5 GHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
46.5% Average
Memory 80.8
1-Core 38.9
2-Core 71.8
44% 63.8 Pts
4-Core 75
8-Core 74.3
10% 74.7 Pts
64-Core 73.6
5% 73.6 Pts
Poor: 25%
This bench: 46.5%
Great: 47%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (G2 Pentium/Celeron 1.1/1.15 GHz)
Clevo(1558 0540) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2761
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
0.47% Terrible
Lighting 0.3
Reflection 1.4
Parallax 1
0% 0.9 fps
MRender 1.6
Gravity 0.7
Splatting 1.1
1% 1.13 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.47%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST500LM012 HN-M500MBB 500GB
36GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2AR10002
SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 70 65 39 69 86 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
40.1% Average
Read 75.5
Write 78.5
Mixed 44.5
SusWrite 64.1
48% 65.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
124% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 40.1%
Great: 59%
Samsung Flash Drive 128GB
119GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 22 22 22 22 21 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
24.8% Poor
Read 28.3
Write 21.5
Mixed 21
SusWrite 21.8
30% 23.2 MB/s
4K Read 3.6
4K Write 4.9
4K Mixed 1.2
221% 3.23 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 24.8%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 0194 SH564568FH8NZPHSCR 6GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 2048 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
38.2% Below average
MC Read 12.8
MC Write 14
MC Mixed 13.3
38% 13.4 GB/s
SC Read 9.5
SC Write 8
SC Mixed 9.6
26% 9.03 GB/s
Latency 79.1
51% 79.1 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 38.2%
Great: 38%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical W540EU Builds (Compare 15 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Positivo W540EU

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback