Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 43% Speed boat	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	0.38% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	29.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3 M 380-$130 21,755 User benchmarks, average bench 40% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.55 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	44.7% Average	Memory 62.7 1-Core 62 2-Core 112 48% 78.9 Pts	4-Core 156 8-Core 155 21% 156 Pts	64-Core 154 10% 154 Pts
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 44.7% Great: 46%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz) 99,513 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Sanyo(144D C643) 2.8GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2900 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	0.38% Terrible	Lighting 0.4 Reflection 1.2 Parallax 0.5 0% 0.7 fps	MRender 1.1 Gravity 0.3 Splatting 0.5 0% 0.63 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.38% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28 424,288 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 46GB free (System drive) Firmware: 03070103 SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 19 19 20 19 37 MB/s Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	29.6% Poor	Read 190 Write 53.9 Mixed 45.6 SusWrite 27.2 17% 79.1 MB/s	4K Read 15.5 4K Write 18.7 4K Mixed 14.6 52% 16.3 MB/s	DQ Read 143 DQ Write 50.3 DQ Mixed 25 37% 72.9 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 29.6% Great: 100%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 0194 SH564568FH8NZPHSCR 6GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 1600, 1334 MHz 4096, 2048 MB Performing below potential (30^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	21.9% Poor	MC Read 7.1 MC Write 6.2 MC Mixed 8.7 21% 7.33 GB/s	SC Read 6.4 SC Write 5 SC Mixed 6.6 17% 6 GB/s	Latency 120 33% 120 ns
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 21.9% Great: 38%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 40%

Jet ski

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 99,513 samples	20x

RAM
SH564568FH8NZPHSCR 2x2GBSmartBench 33%, 376 samples	3x
SH564568FH8NZPHSCR 0194 SH564128FH8NZPHSCG 6GBUnknownBench 30%, 23 samples	2x
M471B5273DH0-CH9 1x4GBSamsungBench 25%, 18,713 samples	1x

Value: 44% - Average

Total price: $158