bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 63%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics2.1% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced. Very high background CPU (54%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemVMware, VMware Virtual Platform
MotherboardIntel 440BX Desktop Reference Platform
Memory26.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 0 GHz
Display2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors, , 2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181212
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 02 '22 at 06:01
Run Duration163 Seconds
Run User CRI-User
Background CPU 54%

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5675
CPU #000, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.05 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
63% Good
Memory 67.7
1-Core 73.4
2-Core 142
55% 94.4 Pts
4-Core 313
8-Core 631
56% 472 Pts
64-Core 987
61% 987 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 63%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GRID K1
Nvidia(10DE 1012) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 849 MHz, MLim: 445 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 369.17
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
2.1% Terrible
Lighting 3.9
Reflection 5.3
Parallax 3.6
3% 4.27 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.1%
Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Vmware Virtual disk 322GB
227GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 80 80 80 83 65 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
44.5% Average
Read 74.7
Write 73.8
Mixed 70.5
SusWrite 77.9
55% 74.2 MB/s
4K Read 3.4
4K Write 6
4K Mixed 4.7
775% 4.7 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 44.5%
Great: 96%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x16GB
2 of 128 slots used
32GB DIMM DRAM
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
44.5% Average
MC Read 18.8
MC Write 14.9
MC Mixed 18.9
50% 17.5 GB/s
SC Read 4.4
SC Write 3.9
SC Mixed 6
14% 4.77 GB/s
Latency 107
37% 107 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 44.5%
Great: 164%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,497 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback