Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 1% Tree trunk	Desktop 35% Sail boat	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 34.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	1.92% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (60^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron N4020 5,047 User benchmarks, average bench 21% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	34.9% Below average	Memory 48.9 1-Core 57.5 2-Core 123 43% 76.4 Pts	4-Core 122 8-Core 121 16% 122 Pts	64-Core 119 7% 119 Pts
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 34.9% Great: 29%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 600 35,976 User benchmarks, average bench 1% HP(103C 85F5) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1191 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	1.92% Terrible	Lighting 2 Reflection 1.9 Parallax 2.3 2% 2.07 fps	MRender 3.1 Gravity 2 Splatting 3.7 2% 2.93 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.92% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD WD10SPZX-00HKTT0 1TB 294,991 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 840GB free (System drive) Firmware: 05.01A05 SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 36 26 59 63 54 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	21.1% Poor	Read 28.1 Write 92 Mixed 12.7 SusWrite 45.6 32% 44.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.2 4K Write 0.3 4K Mixed 0.6 81% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 21.1% Great: 79%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Lexar Co Limited LD4AS008G-H2666GSC 1x8GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	20.9% Poor	MC Read 6.7 MC Write 8.2 MC Mixed 7.9 22% 7.6 GB/s	SC Read 3.3 SC Write 4.5 SC Mixed 4.7 12% 4.17 GB/s	Latency 165 24% 165 ns
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 20.9% Great: 44%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	9	7	60	15.5"	1280 720	AUO3191

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 55%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

GPU
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 5%, 110,580 samples	434x
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 2%, 1,390 samples	52x
MX130NvidiaBench 9%, 14,117 samples	40x

SSD
SSDPEKNW512G8H 512GBIntelBench 147%, 27,018 samples	46x
MZVLB512HBJQ-000H1 512GBSamsungBench 240%, 17,828 samples	42x
KIOXIA 512GBKxg60znv512gBench 192%, 6,082 samples	19x

RAM
4ATF1G64HZ-3G2E1 1x8GBMicronBench 38%, 20,126 samples	65x
M471A1K43CB1-CTD 2x8GBSamsungBench 76%, 108,106 samples	40x
M471A1K43CB1-CTD 1x8GBSamsungBench 40%, 96,646 samples	39x