PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 27% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 77.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asrock Z77 Pro3 (all builds) |
Memory | 2.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1920x1080x4294967296 szín |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20180313 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Aug 02 '22 at 15:25 |
Run Duration | 251 Seconds |
Run User | HUN-User |
Background CPU | 30% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i7-2600K-$319
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
|
72.2%
Very good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Asus(1043 85D3) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 512.15
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
27%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
31GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKK1B3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 272 392 289 25 27 25 MB/s
|
77.5%
Very good
|
|||
Samsung HD252KJ 250GB
6GB free
Firmware: CM100-12
SusWrite @10s intervals: 44 49 54 48 51 53 MB/s
|
26.5%
Poor
|
|||
Adata S102 Pro USB 3.0 16GB-$22
15GB free, PID 312b
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 19 20 20 20 19 MB/s
|
11.9%
Very poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown M2F4G64CB8HG5N-CG Kingston 99U5584-009.A00LF 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
|
43.1%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-3570KIntel $136Bench 68%, 185,516 samples | 461x |
Core i7-3770KIntel $175Bench 72%, 165,979 samples | 199x |
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples | 175x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 119x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 88x |
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 74x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 89% - Excellent | Total price: $492 |