Performance Results


Gaming 41% Speed boat	Desktop 73% Battleship	Workstation 38% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	52.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	91.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

PC Performing as expected (46^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2670-$53 4,803 User benchmarks, average bench 67% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	65.8% Good	Memory 78 1-Core 83 2-Core 149 62% 103 Pts	4-Core 289 8-Core 514 48% 402 Pts	64-Core 755 47% 755 Pts
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 65.8% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro M5000 1,540 User benchmarks, average bench 50% Nvidia(10DE 1152) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1126 MHz, MLim: 1652 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 511.79 Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	52.1% Above average	Lighting 62.7 Reflection 73 Parallax 65.1 51% 66.9 fps	MRender 68.8 Gravity 63.6 Splatting 65.8 54% 66.1 fps
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 52.1% Great: 52%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 2TB-$155 44,787 User benchmarks, average bench 108% 1TB free (System drive) Firmware: M3CR043 SusWrite @10s intervals: 371 423 439 439 445 444 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	91.9% Outstanding	Read 354 Write 444 Mixed 372 SusWrite 427 90% 399 MB/s	4K Read 32.5 4K Write 55.6 4K Mixed 40.4 130% 42.8 MB/s	DQ Read 294 DQ Write 191 DQ Mixed 159 141% 215 MB/s
Poor: 83% ↑ This bench: 91.9% Great: 125%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 0x4D33373842353137335148302D434B3020 8x4GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 8 of 8 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	83.9% Excellent	MC Read 33.9 MC Write 35.2 MC Mixed 30.6 95% 33.2 GB/s	SC Read 14 SC Write 10.9 SC Mixed 9.7 33% 11.5 GB/s	Latency 84.3 48% 84.3 ns
Poor: 83% ↑ This bench: 83.9% Great: 84%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	1,322x
SVGA 3DVmwareBench 20%, 11,474 samples	1,145x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	1,060x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	829x
Virtual NVMe Disk 64GBVmwareBench 62%, 2,103 samples	458x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	432x

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $325