Today's hottest deals

bin bin

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 38%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics52.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive91.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
System
MotherboardIntel DX79TO
Memory25.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20140307
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 03 '22 at 19:10
Run Duration148 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2670-$53
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
65.8% Good
Memory 78
1-Core 83
2-Core 149
62% 103 Pts
4-Core 289
8-Core 514
48% 402 Pts
64-Core 755
47% 755 Pts
Poor: 55%
This bench: 65.8%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro M5000
Nvidia(10DE 1152) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1126 MHz, MLim: 1652 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 511.79
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
52.1% Above average
Lighting 62.7
Reflection 73
Parallax 65.1
51% 66.9 fps
MRender 68.8
Gravity 63.6
Splatting 65.8
54% 66.1 fps
Poor: 47%
This bench: 52.1%
Great: 52%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 2TB-$147
1TB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR043
SusWrite @10s intervals: 371 423 439 439 445 444 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
91.9% Outstanding
Read 354
Write 444
Mixed 372
SusWrite 427
90% 399 MB/s
4K Read 32.5
4K Write 55.6
4K Mixed 40.4
130% 42.8 MB/s
DQ Read 294
DQ Write 191
DQ Mixed 159
141% 215 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 91.9%
Great: 124%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 0x4D33373842353137335148302D434B3020 8x4GB
8 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
83.9% Excellent
MC Read 33.9
MC Write 35.2
MC Mixed 30.6
95% 33.2 GB/s
SC Read 14
SC Write 10.9
SC Mixed 9.7
33% 11.5 GB/s
Latency 84.3
48% 84.3 ns
Poor: 83%
This bench: 83.9%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 25,042 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $322
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback