Today's hottest deals

MSI MS-16P7

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (13th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 87 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemMicro-Star GE63 Raider RGB 9SE
MotherboardMSI MS-16P7  (all builds)
Memory1.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1600 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors, 1600 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190329
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateAug 06 '22 at 12:49
Run Duration171 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU 23%

 PC Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
65.9% Good
Memory 83.4
1-Core 99.9
2-Core 136
66% 107 Pts
4-Core 262
8-Core 399
41% 331 Pts
64-Core 534
33% 534 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 65.9%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060 (Mobile)
MSI(1462 126A) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.1659
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 90.8
Reflection 94.6
Parallax 91.7
74% 92.4 fps
Gravity 79.9
Splatting 81.8
72% 80.9 fps
Poor: 49% Great: 83%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G-1032 512GB
5GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 20140000
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 694
Write 864
Mixed 839
180% 799 MB/s
4K Read 32.1
4K Write 53.9
4K Mixed 35.9
123% 40.6 MB/s
DQ Read 584
DQ Write 381
DQ Mixed 510
373% 492 MB/s
Poor: 107% Great: 204%
Seagate ST1000LM049-2GH172 1TB
2GB free
Firmware: SDM1
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 21.7
Write 92.1
Mixed 48.7
41% 54.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 5.3
4K Mixed 0.4
159% 2.03 MB/s
Poor: 32% Great: 95%
Intenso External USB-3.0 4TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 1203
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 21 20 19 18 18 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
13.5% Very poor
Read 27.9
Write 37.1
Mixed 29.9
SusWrite 19
21% 28.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.4
76% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 13.5%
Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GS6CJR8N-VK 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
54.8% Above average
MC Read 19.9
MC Write 20.5
MC Mixed 18.5
56% 19.6 GB/s
SC Read 14.2
SC Write 16.7
SC Mixed 10.4
39% 13.8 GB/s
Latency 74.4
54% 74.4 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 54.8%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MS-16P7 Builds (Compare 1,646 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI MS-16P7

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $365
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback