Asus TUF GAMING Z590-PLUS WIFI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 113%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 109%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 115%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 105%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics104% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive228% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
22 months ago, 22 months ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING Z590-PLUS WIFI  (all builds)
Memory23.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display5760 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20211027
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 09 '22 at 20:37
Run Duration330 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU10%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-11700K-$234
LGA1200, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.75 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Memory 91.8
1-Core 169
2-Core 334
107% 198 Pts
4-Core 636
8-Core 1124
106% 880 Pts
64-Core 1,657
103% 1,657 Pts
Poor: 86%
This bench: 105%
Great: 110%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
MSI(1462 3367) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 516.40
Performing below potential (71st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
104% Outstanding
Lighting 130
Reflection 143
Parallax 133
106% 136 fps
MRender 117
Gravity 140
Splatting 119
102% 125 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 104%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDBA3V5000ANC-WRSN 500GB
262GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 211210WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 797 428 333 301 321 296 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
228% Outstanding
Read 1,549
Write 1613
Mixed 1,246
SusWrite 413
270% 1,205 MB/s
4K Read 50.9
4K Write 212
4K Mixed 75.3
286% 113 MB/s
DQ Read 1,224
DQ Write 1,160
DQ Mixed 972
790% 1,118 MB/s
Poor: 130%
This bench: 228%
Great: 239%
WDC WD40EZAZ-00SF3B0 4TB
3TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 160 164 165 165 165 164 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
22.4% Poor
Read 146
Write 137
Mixed 102
SusWrite 164
31% 137 MB/s
4K Read 9.9
4K Write 12.2
4K Mixed 1.1
23% 7.73 MB/s
DQ Read 1.2
DQ Write 11.3
DQ Mixed 0.2
2% 4.23 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 22.4%
Great: 39%
Seagate FireCuda 520LE SSD ZP1000GM30012 1TB
647GB free
Firmware: STNSC016
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3926 3985 3989 4013 3987 3983 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
499% Outstanding
Read 2,160
Write 3,203
Mixed 2,188
SusWrite 3,980
655% 2,883 MB/s
4K Read 48.8
4K Write 252
4K Mixed 91.8
325% 131 MB/s
DQ Read 1,772
DQ Write 1350
DQ Mixed 1,599
1,185% 1,574 MB/s
Poor: 158%
This bench: 499%
Great: 499%
Corsair Force NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$130
710GB free
Firmware: ECFM12.2 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1484 921 922 924 927 924 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
255% Outstanding
Read 1,514
Write 2,315
Mixed 1,575
SusWrite 1,017
363% 1,605 MB/s
4K Read 35
4K Write 173
4K Mixed 53.7
214% 87.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1,692
DQ Write 1,348
DQ Mixed 1482
1,119% 1,507 MB/s
Poor: 148%
This bench: 255%
Great: 322%
Samsung Spinpoint F4 2TB-$119
208GB free
Firmware: 1AQ10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 105 107 106 111 107 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
62.9% Good
Read 112
Write 29.7
Mixed 63.6
SusWrite 107
58% 78 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.8
162% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 62.9%
Great: 72%
Seagate FA GoFlex Desk 2TB
1GB free, PID 50a1
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 58.6
Write 64.7
Mixed 25.4
61% 49.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.4
30% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 11% Great: 49%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Silicon Power Computer & Communications SP008GXLZU320BSB Power Computer & Communications Power Computer & Communications SP008GXLZU320BSB Power Computer & Communications 32GB
2667, 2667, 2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
107% Outstanding
MC Read 39.6
MC Write 38.9
MC Mixed 37.2
110% 38.6 GB/s
SC Read 26.7
SC Write 38.3
SC Mixed 30.7
91% 31.9 GB/s
Latency 64.4
62% 64.4 ns
Poor: 97%
This bench: 107%
Great: 113%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING Z590-PLUS WIFI Builds (Compare 10,920 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 150%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 106%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 151%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING Z590-PLUS WIFI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $841
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback