Today's hottest deals

MSI MS-16WK

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics5.9% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive88.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemMicro-Star Bravo 15 A4DDR
MotherboardMSI MS-16WK  (all builds)
Memory1.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200521
Uptime9.3 Days
Run DateAug 12 '22 at 20:27
Run Duration209 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
FP6, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
85% Excellent
Memory 81.7
1-Core 81
2-Core 155
63% 106 Pts
4-Core 474
8-Core 825
79% 650 Pts
64-Core 1,008
62% 1,008 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 85%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 4000 (iGPU)
MSI(1462 12B5) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 20.10.23.01
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
5.9% Terrible
Lighting 6.3
Reflection 18.3
Parallax 8.6
5% 11.1 fps
MRender 5.4
Gravity 15.1
Splatting 7
7% 9.17 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 5.9%
Great: 17%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLQ256HAJD-00000 256GB
30GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FXV7000Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 75 66 65 61 59 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
88.2% Excellent
Read 923
Write 156
Mixed 226
SusWrite 72.2
74% 344 MB/s
4K Read 25.6
4K Write 84.9
4K Mixed 33.8
127% 48.1 MB/s
DQ Read 247
DQ Write 104
DQ Mixed 179
132% 177 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 88.2%
Great: 169%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CWE 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
53.1% Above average
MC Read 20.6
MC Write 18.5
MC Mixed 17.7
54% 18.9 GB/s
SC Read 12.3
SC Write 17
SC Mixed 12.2
40% 13.8 GB/s
Latency 77.4
52% 77.4 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 53.1%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MS-16WK Builds (Compare 224 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI MS-16WK

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $330
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback