Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 74% Battleship	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	3.62% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	12.4% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

22 months ago, 22 months ago.

PC Performing as expected (60^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-9100-$113 7,621 User benchmarks, average bench 80% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	82.3% Excellent	Memory 83.3 1-Core 127 2-Core 252 85% 154 Pts	4-Core 485 8-Core 390 61% 438 Pts	64-Core 483 30% 483 Pts
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 82.3% Great: 88%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710 187,161 User benchmarks, average bench 3% MSI(1462 8C93) 2GB CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 473.81 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	3.62% Terrible	Lighting 4.4 Reflection 4.2 Parallax 4.5 4% 4.37 fps	MRender 4.4 Gravity 3.9 Splatting 5 4% 4.43 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.62% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
SSD HEORIADY HX-001 F 240G 240GB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 47GB free (System drive) Firmware: U0205A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 35 21 23 18 16 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	12.4% Very poor	Read 25.1 Write 94 Mixed 170 SusWrite 27.1 18% 79.2 MB/s	4K Read 22.3 4K Write 5.1 4K Mixed 0.2 37% 9.2 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 12.4% Great: 96%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$23 203,744 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 204GB free Firmware: 05.01D05 SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 105 104 100 106 106 MB/s Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	58.5% Above average	Read 99.4 Write 90.8 Mixed 73.9 SusWrite 104 68% 92.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.7 137% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 58.5% Great: 69%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378A5244CB0-CTD 0B2C HKED4081CAA1D0MA1 12GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 2400, 2400 MHz 4096, 8192 MB Performing below potential (20^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	38% Below average	MC Read 13.9 MC Write 12.4 MC Mixed 11.1 36% 12.5 GB/s	SC Read 11.8 SC Write 14.4 SC Mixed 10.8 35% 12.3 GB/s	Latency 74.7 54% 74.7 ns
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 38% Great: 71%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 42%

Speed boat

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 36%

Jet ski

GPU
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	704x
RTX 2060Nvidia $267Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	569x
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	366x

RAM
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $69Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	198x
PSD48G266681 2x8GBPatriotBench 79%, 6,425 samples	197x
DDR4 3000 2x8GBAdataBench 80%, 77,202 samples	163x

Value: 81% - Excellent

Total price: $337