Performance Results


Gaming 9% Tree trunk	Desktop 77% Battleship	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	4.13% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	43% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

PC Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-9100-$121 7,621 User benchmarks, average bench 80% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	87.8% Excellent	Memory 89.7 1-Core 121 2-Core 251 86% 154 Pts	4-Core 496 8-Core 496 66% 496 Pts	64-Core 491 30% 491 Pts
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 87.8% Great: 88%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630 (Desktop Coffee Lake i3) 32,403 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Asus(1043 8694) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2111 Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	4.13% Terrible	Lighting 6.2 Reflection 4.7 Parallax 7.5 5% 6.13 fps	MRender 9.7 Gravity 0.3 Splatting 0.1 2% 3.37 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.13% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SSD HEORIADY HX-001 F 240G 240GB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 27GB free (System drive) Firmware: U0205A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 30 24 20 23 19 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	43% Average	Read 355 Write 77.1 Mixed 17.6 SusWrite 25.6 25% 119 MB/s	4K Read 31.9 4K Write 77 4K Mixed 0.3 90% 36.4 MB/s	DQ Read 151 DQ Write 1.8 DQ Mixed 12.7 25% 55.2 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 43% Great: 96%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$23 203,744 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 209GB free Firmware: 05.01D05 SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 119 115 119 119 119 MB/s Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	66.4% Good	Read 113 Write 113 Mixed 77 SusWrite 118 78% 105 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.8 148% 1 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 66.4% Great: 69%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378A5244CB0-CTD 0B2C HKED4081CAA1D0MA1 12GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 2400, 2400 MHz 4096, 8192 MB Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	52.9% Above average	MC Read 20 MC Write 19.6 MC Mixed 15 52% 18.2 GB/s	SC Read 13.9 SC Write 17.3 SC Mixed 16 45% 15.7 GB/s	Latency 67.7 59% 67.7 ns
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 52.9% Great: 71%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 42%

Speed boat

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 36%

Jet ski

GPU
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	703x
RTX 2060Nvidia $267Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	569x
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	366x

RAM
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $71Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	198x
PSD48G266681 2x8GBPatriotBench 79%, 6,425 samples	196x
DDR4 3000 2x8GBAdataBench 80%, 77,202 samples	163x

Value: 81% - Excellent

Total price: $339