Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

TEST
YOUR PC

ADD TO PC
BUILD

Gigabyte GA-X99-SOC Force-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 15% Surfboard	Desktop 48% Yacht	Workstation 15% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (10th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 90 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	32.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	122% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Gigabyte Default string
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-X99-SOC Force-CF (all builds)
Memory	13.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180615
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 17 '22 at 05:14
Run Duration	166 Seconds
Run User	IND-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2678 v3 6,301 User benchmarks, average bench 71% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 1.2 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	37.2% Below average	Memory 49 1-Core 34.4 2-Core 68.9 32% 50.8 Pts	4-Core 138 8-Core 266 24% 202 Pts	64-Core 542 34% 542 Pts
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 37.2% Great: 79%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 470-$126 94,030 User benchmarks, average bench 40% Sapphire(174B E349) CLim: 1216 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 22.Q2 Performing below potential (16^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	32.9% Below average	Lighting 36.6 Reflection 57.5 Parallax 58.2 30% 50.8 fps	MRender 58.5 Gravity 45 Splatting 42.2 39% 48.6 fps
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 32.9% Great: 47%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Pc401 NVMe SK hynix 512GB 10,182 User benchmarks, average bench 146% 436GB free (System drive) Firmware: 80006E00 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 685 597 608 611 609 611 MB/s Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	122% Outstanding	Read 963 Write 1,032 Mixed 984 SusWrite 620 203% 900 MB/s	4K Read 29.2 4K Write 42.9 4K Mixed 34 110% 35.4 MB/s	DQ Read 296 DQ Write 181 DQ Mixed 251 184% 243 MB/s
Poor: 79% ↑ This bench: 122% Great: 215%
Seagate BUP Portable 4TB 5,255 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 2TB free Firmware: 0004 SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 17 17 17 17 18 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	15.3% Very poor	Read 35 Write 36.7 Mixed 32.8 SusWrite 17.3 23% 30.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 3.2 4K Mixed 0.5 152% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 15.3% Great: 69%
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 4TB 7,970 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 764GB free Firmware: D781 SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 17 17 17 17 17 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	14.8% Very poor	Read 32.5 Write 35.7 Mixed 33 SusWrite 17.2 22% 29.6 MB/s	4K Read 2.2 4K Write 3.9 4K Mixed 0.5 220% 2.2 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 14.8% Great: 98%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378A2K43BB1-CPB 1x16GB 3,286 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 1 of 8 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	21.4% Poor	MC Read 8.7 MC Write 4.6 MC Mixed 8.5 21% 7.27 GB/s	SC Read 7 SC Write 5 SC Mixed 8.2 19% 6.73 GB/s	Latency 164 24% 164 ns
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 21.4% Great: 42%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-X99-SOC Force-CF Builds (Compare 28 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 43%

Speed boat

Desktop 81%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 38%

Jet ski

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X99-SOC Force-CF

CPU
Core i7-5820KIntel $130Bench 77%, 101,694 samples	12x
Core i7-5960XIntel $189Bench 80%, 15,468 samples	4x
Core i7-5930KIntel $116Bench 80%, 34,039 samples	4x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	4x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	3x
GTX 1070Nvidia $200Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	3x

SSD
A400 480GBKingston $35Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	5x
NVMe KIOXIA 256GBKbg40zns256gBench 149%, 13,282 samples	3x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $85Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	2x

RAM
HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GBKingstonBench 76%, 122,822 samples	2x
BLS4G4D240FSA.8FADG 4x4GBCrucialBench 85%, 573 samples	2x
M378A1K43BB2G3A141 16GBUnknownBench 70%, 21 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 69% - Good

Total price: $365

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350