Toshiba Satellite L650D

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 31%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.1% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (62%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemToshiba Satellite L650D  (all builds)
MotherboardTOSHIBA Portable PC
Memory4.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20110629
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 20 '22 at 19:47
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User SRB-User
Background CPU 62%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II P960
Socket S1G4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
36.7% Below average
Memory 59.3
1-Core 28
2-Core 52.7
32% 46.7 Pts
4-Core 82.4
8-Core 90.4
11% 86.4 Pts
64-Core 80.5
5% 80.5 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 36.7%
Great: 40%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4250
Toshiba(1179 FD18) 256MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.1100
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
1.1% Terrible
Lighting 1.1
Reflection 0.2
Parallax 0.5
1% 0.6 fps
MRender 0.9
Gravity 0.9
Splatting 3.1
2% 1.63 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 1.1%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Momentus Thin 5400.9 2.5" 500GB-$21
232GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0001SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 40 40 28 39 39 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
13.9% Very poor
Read 11.8
Write 42.2
Mixed 22.3
SusWrite 36.4
21% 28.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.3
53% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 13.9%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5428-046.A00LF ACR512X64D3S13C9G 8GB
1066, 1066 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
21.5% Poor
MC Read 9
MC Write 5.9
MC Mixed 7.6
21% 7.5 GB/s
SC Read 5.2
SC Write 4.4
SC Mixed 4.9
14% 4.83 GB/s
Latency 130
31% 130 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 21.5%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Satellite L650D Builds (Compare 11 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 35%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Toshiba Satellite L650D

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Very good Total price: $20
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback