MSI A320M PRO-VH PLUS (MS-7B07)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics10.9% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive68.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B07
MotherboardMSI A320M PRO-VH PLUS (MS-7B07)  (all builds)
Memory4.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180507
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 23 '22 at 02:57
Run Duration207 Seconds
Run User COL-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G-$104
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
77.6% Very good
Memory 74.8
1-Core 109
2-Core 225
75% 136 Pts
4-Core 464
8-Core 457
62% 461 Pts
64-Core 434
27% 434 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 77.6%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 (Ryzen iGPU)
MSI(1462 7B07) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 22.6.1
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
10.9% Very poor
Lighting 14.1
Reflection 12.2
Parallax 19.1
12% 15.1 fps
MRender 7
Gravity 15.8
Splatting 12.5
10% 11.8 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 10.9%
Great: 11%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hyundai 120GB SSD 120GB
40GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V4.7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 169 72 74 72 73 73 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
68.3% Good
Read 468
Write 335
Mixed 315
SusWrite 88.9
67% 302 MB/s
4K Read 32.3
4K Write 77.2
4K Mixed 24.9
122% 44.8 MB/s
DQ Read 135
DQ Write 221
DQ Mixed 34.1
66% 130 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 68.3%
Great: 84%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$28
404GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 130 129 130 129 131 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
81.4% Excellent
Read 154
Write 154
Mixed 78.7
SusWrite 130
95% 129 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
152% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 81.4%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GU6AFR8N-KC 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 1333 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
48.1% Average
MC Read 18.4
MC Write 15.6
MC Mixed 15.7
47% 16.6 GB/s
SC Read 15.2
SC Write 15.1
SC Mixed 16.8
45% 15.7 GB/s
Latency 90.8
44% 90.8 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 48.1%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A320M PRO-VH PLUS (MS-7B07) Builds (Compare 453 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard

Motherboard: MSI A320M PRO-VH PLUS (MS-7B07)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $261
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $120
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback