bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 108%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Memory53.7GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 53.7GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced.
MotherboardMicrosoft Virtual Machine
Memory50 GB free of 53.7109 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit cores, 2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191101
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 23 '22 at 16:28
Run Duration222 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: AMD Ryzen 9 5900X 12-Core
None, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
108% Outstanding
Memory 91.8
1-Core 173
2-Core 338
108% 201 Pts
4-Core 666
8-Core 1,150
110% 908 Pts
64-Core 2,231
138% 2,231 Pts
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Disco Virtual da Microsoft 136GB
5GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,663
Write 2,368
Mixed 1,030
378% 1687 MB/s
4K Read 27.3
4K Write 50.8
4K Mixed 30.5
107% 36.2 MB/s
DQ Read 846
DQ Write 466
DQ Mixed 576
450% 630 MB/s
Poor: 36% Great: 60%
Samsung 750 EVO 120GB-$35
7GB free
Firmware: MAT0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 359
Write 359
Mixed 281
74% 333 MB/s
4K Read 28.4
4K Write 46
4K Mixed 33.6
110% 36 MB/s
DQ Read 226
DQ Write 199
DQ Mixed 219
162% 215 MB/s
Poor: 65% Great: 110%
Nvme WDC WDS480G2G0C- 480GB
250GB free
Firmware: 00WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 738 239 243 244 244 242 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
157% Outstanding
Read 1,475
Write 1,750
Mixed 1,305
SusWrite 325
272% 1,214 MB/s
4K Read 32.6
4K Write 60.5
4K Mixed 39.5
132% 44.2 MB/s
DQ Read 976
DQ Write 695
DQ Mixed 826
620% 833 MB/s
Poor: 112%
This bench: 157%
Great: 219%
Adata HD710 PRO 1TB
201GB free
Firmware: 9203
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 78 81 81 81 81 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
43.6% Average
Read 72.3
Write 115
Mixed 91.2
SusWrite 79.5
67% 89.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.7
138% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 43.6%
Great: 78%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Microsoft Corporation None Corporation None Corporation None 53GB
0, 0, 0 MHz
3968, 23532, 27500 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
131% Outstanding
MC Read 59.5
MC Write 43
MC Mixed 43.9
139% 48.8 GB/s
SC Read 32
SC Write 26.5
SC Mixed 45.2
99% 34.6 GB/s
Latency 64.4
62% 64.4 ns
Poor: 84%
This bench: 131%
Great: 131%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,565 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $251WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback