Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 65% Battle cruiser	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	4.44% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	HP Compaq 8200 Elite SFF PC (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 1495
Memory	3.3 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20110609
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 25 '22 at 07:39
Run Duration	148 Seconds
Run User	IRQ-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2500 82,538 User benchmarks, average bench 63% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	74.4% Very good	Memory 92.2 1-Core 94.1 2-Core 176 72% 121 Pts	4-Core 328 8-Core 335 44% 331 Pts	64-Core 296 18% 296 Pts
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 74.4% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6500 1,367 User benchmarks, average bench 4% XFX(1682 6570) 2GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008 Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	4.44% Terrible	Lighting 5.7 Reflection 6 Parallax 5 5% 5.57 fps	MRender 5.1 Gravity 4.4 Splatting 5.2 4% 4.9 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 4.44% Great: 5%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Purple 1TB (2014)-$60 18,782 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 615GB free (System drive) Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 82 87 68 71 98 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	49.7% Average	Read 94.6 Write 104 Mixed 40.3 SusWrite 78.5 58% 79.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.7 137% 1 MB/s
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 49.7% Great: 85%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT351U6BFR8C-H9 Samsung M378B5673FH0-CH9 6GB 27 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 2048 MB Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	50.3% Above average	MC Read 17.4 MC Write 18.1 MC Mixed 15.7 49% 17.1 GB/s	SC Read 13.7 SC Write 16.1 SC Mixed 15.4 43% 15.1 GB/s	Latency 63.7 63% 63.7 ns
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 50.3% Great: 50%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 56%

Gunboat

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	1,776x
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	279x
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	241x

RAM
9905584-014.A00LF 2x4GBKingstonBench 51%, 436 samples	38x
M378B5773DH0-CH9 2x2GBSamsungBench 45%, 4,605 samples	37x
M378B5273DH0-CH9 1x4GBSamsungBench 27%, 3,798 samples	22x

Value: 58% - Above average

Total price: $278