bin bin

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics6.62% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive50.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
System
MotherboardIntel DH67BL
Memory3.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110301
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateAug 28 '22 at 15:24
Run Duration175 Seconds
Run User ZAF-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600-$189
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
67.8% Good
Memory 83.5
1-Core 91.3
2-Core 177
68% 117 Pts
4-Core 289
8-Core 370
42% 329 Pts
64-Core 386
24% 386 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 67.8%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTS 450
MSI(1462 2366) 1GB
CLim: 783 MHz, MLim: 902 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
6.62% Terrible
Lighting 8.9
Reflection 15.7
Parallax 4.7
7% 9.77 fps
MRender 12.5
Gravity 9.9
Splatting 0.2
5% 7.53 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 6.62%
Great: 8%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS500G2B0A-00SM50 500GB
249GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 415020WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 221 212 206 208 206 207 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
50.1% Above average
Read 300
Write 274
Mixed 221
SusWrite 210
56% 251 MB/s
4K Read 19.4
4K Write 32
4K Mixed 17.9
69% 23.1 MB/s
DQ Read 130
DQ Write 55.6
DQ Mixed 72.5
59% 85.9 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 50.1%
Great: 111%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905471-006.A02LF 9905471-006.A01LF 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
48.5% Average
MC Read 17.6
MC Write 17
MC Mixed 15.4
48% 16.7 GB/s
SC Read 12.9
SC Write 15.9
SC Mixed 14.7
41% 14.5 GB/s
Latency 74.2
54% 74.2 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 48.5%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,496 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback