Today's hottest deals

Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X509JB_X509JB

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (15th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 85 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics5.21% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive95.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (42%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 83% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X509JB_X509JB  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X509JB
Memory0.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit renk,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210812
Uptime1.2 Days
Run DateAug 30 '22 at 23:23
Run Duration228 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 42%
CPU Throttled 83%

 PC Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-1035G1
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.2 GHz, turbo 1.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
36.3% Below average
Memory 51.7
1-Core 38.2
2-Core 76.7
35% 55.5 Pts
4-Core 115
8-Core 164
18% 139 Pts
64-Core 197
12% 197 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 36.3%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia MX110
Asus(1043 183F) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 27.21.14.6259
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
5.21% Terrible
Lighting 7
Reflection 11.8
Parallax 7.4
6% 8.73 fps
MRender 5.9
Gravity 8
Splatting 2.7
4% 5.53 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 5.21%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G-1202 512GB
295GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 20200000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 656 443 429 413 498 417 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
95.9% Outstanding
Read 799
Write 788
Mixed 768
SusWrite 476
159% 707 MB/s
4K Read 12.9
4K Write 41.7
4K Mixed 29.4
79% 28 MB/s
DQ Read 287
DQ Write 128
DQ Mixed 176
139% 197 MB/s
Poor: 83%
This bench: 95.9%
Great: 210%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CTD 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
52.2% Above average
MC Read 19.3
MC Write 23.2
MC Mixed 20.4
60% 21 GB/s
SC Read 6.6
SC Write 11.1
SC Mixed 1.6
18% 6.43 GB/s
Latency 155
26% 155 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 52.2%
Great: 74%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X509JB_X509JB Builds (Compare 388 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X509JB_X509JB

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback