Today's hottest deals

Asus ROG STRIX X370-F GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 75%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 69%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics91.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive24.6% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX X370-F GAMING  (all builds)
Memory10.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180420
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateAug 31 '22 at 01:35
Run Duration243 Seconds
Run User NZL-User
Background CPU8%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2600X-$175
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
79.4% Very good
Memory 72.6
1-Core 122
2-Core 246
80% 147 Pts
4-Core 463
8-Core 694
72% 578 Pts
64-Core 912
56% 912 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 79.4%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 457.51
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
91.3% Outstanding
Lighting 131
Reflection 140
Parallax 131
107% 134 fps
MRender 116
Gravity 138
Splatting 0.1
61% 84.6 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 91.3%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Apacer AS340 240GB
15GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AP612PE0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 38 58 27 25 31 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
24.6% Poor
Read 416
Write 249
Mixed 165
SusWrite 47.6
48% 219 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 16.6
4K Mixed 1.4
12% 6.2 MB/s
DQ Read 67.5
DQ Write 13.6
DQ Mixed 43.7
31% 41.6 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 24.6%
Great: 95%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$116
678GB free
Firmware: 3B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2266 2316 2316 2317 2307 866 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
340% Outstanding
Read 2,392
Write 2,288
Mixed 2,201
SusWrite 2,064
504% 2,236 MB/s
4K Read 63.8
4K Write 117
4K Mixed 79.2
260% 86.7 MB/s
DQ Read 970
DQ Write 727
DQ Mixed 846
633% 848 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 340%
Great: 410%
VendorCo ProductCode 8GB
7GB free, PID 5678
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 18 17 18 16 18 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
7.71% Terrible
Read 22.7
Write 11.2
Mixed 6.7
SusWrite 16.6
18% 14.3 MB/s
4K Read 3.4
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
13% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 7.71%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F4-2666C19-8GIS F4-2666C15-4GVR F4-2666C15-4GVR 16GB
2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
59.1% Above average
MC Read 22.6
MC Write 19.8
MC Mixed 19.1
59% 20.5 GB/s
SC Read 19.3
SC Write 21.5
SC Mixed 20.6
58% 20.5 GB/s
Latency 95.6
42% 95.6 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 59.1%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG STRIX X370-F GAMING Builds (Compare 960 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 81%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 79%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X370-F GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 99% - Outstanding Total price: $471
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback