Gigabyte GA-B85M-D3H

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (15th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 85 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.28% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive75.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (43%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B85M-D3H  (all builds)
Memory9.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit색,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130510
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateSep 02 '22 at 17:21
Run Duration214 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU 43%

 PC Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4670-$51
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
55.9% Above average
Memory 67
1-Core 99.6
2-Core 185
66% 117 Pts
4-Core 254
8-Core 291
36% 273 Pts
64-Core 306
19% 306 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 55.9%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)-$15
Gigabyte(1458 D000) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5171
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
3.28% Terrible
Lighting 3.7
Reflection 12
Parallax 6.5
3% 7.4 fps
MRender 7.1
Gravity 2.4
Splatting 4.6
4% 4.7 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.28%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$190
216GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 272 261 272 253 263 265 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
75.1% Very good
Read 436
Write 287
Mixed 318
SusWrite 264
73% 326 MB/s
4K Read 29.6
4K Write 33.8
4K Mixed 32
104% 31.8 MB/s
DQ Read 338
DQ Write 72.7
DQ Mixed 171
134% 194 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 75.1%
Great: 124%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$60
61GB free
Firmware: 0A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 89 85 87 82 91 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
41.2% Average
Read 56.2
Write 60.3
Mixed 50.2
SusWrite 87.2
47% 63.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.6
120% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 41.2%
Great: 83%
WDC WD80 EZAZ-11TDBA0 8TB
134GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.3 0.5 0.8 0.6 0.6 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
20% Very poor
Read 39.2
Write 38.9
Mixed 37.2
SusWrite 0.5
37% 29 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 4.5
4K Mixed 1
193% 2.37 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 20%
Great: 62%
WD easystore 25FB 8TB
139GB free, PID 25fb
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 34 34 33 34 34 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
26.3% Poor
Read 35.7
Write 33.1
Mixed 31.3
SusWrite 33.8
45% 33.5 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 4.4
4K Mixed 0.9
185% 2.17 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 26.3%
Great: 86%
WDC WD20 EZRX-00DC0B0 2TB
621GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 31 29 29 31 30 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
14% Very poor
Read 40.1
Write 35.9
Mixed 29.6
SusWrite 29.6
45% 33.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.6
40% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 14%
Great: 57%
WDC WD20 EZRX-00DC0B0 2TB
132GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.4 5.2 5.1 4.9 5.3 4.8 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
14.4% Very poor
Read 37.3
Write 37.2
Mixed 29.6
SusWrite 4.9
35% 27.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.9
119% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 14.4%
Great: 57%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
BKH800UD51208-1600 Samsung M378B1G73EB0-CK0 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
54.9% Above average
MC Read 20
MC Write 21
MC Mixed 17.6
56% 19.5 GB/s
SC Read 14.2
SC Write 18.6
SC Mixed 18.6
49% 17.1 GB/s
Latency 109
37% 109 ns
Poor: 54%
This bench: 54.9%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-B85M-D3H Builds (Compare 3,795 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B85M-D3H - $76

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $313
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback