Today's hottest deals

Dell Precision T3600

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics0.96% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive66.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemDell Precision T3600
MotherboardDell Precision T3600  (all builds)
Memory24.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190625
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateSep 02 '22 at 22:57
Run Duration616 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-1620 0-$345
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
71.1% Very good
Memory 83.1
1-Core 97.3
2-Core 177
70% 119 Pts
4-Core 320
8-Core 483
50% 401 Pts
64-Core 481
30% 481 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 71.1%
Great: 77%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro NVS 450
Nvidia(10DE 0619) 256MB
Ram: 256MB, Driver: 342.00
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 0.3
Reflection 1.1
0% 0.7 fps
Poor: 0% Great: 1%
Nvidia NVS 300
Nvidia(10DE 0862) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 342.00
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.96% Terrible
Lighting 0.9
Reflection 0.3
Parallax 0.4
1% 0.53 fps
MRender 2
Gravity 0.4
Splatting 2.5
1% 1.63 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.96%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
362GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 300 298 284 296 302 298 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
66.4% Good
Read 422
Write 296
Mixed 272
SusWrite 296
72% 322 MB/s
4K Read 17.9
4K Write 53.6
4K Mixed 23.5
86% 31.7 MB/s
DQ Read 172
DQ Write 54.2
DQ Mixed 83.8
70% 103 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 66.4%
Great: 129%
WDC WDS100T2B0A-00SM50 1TB
722GB free
Firmware: 411030WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 311 307 302 312 313 312 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
64.1% Good
Read 437
Write 321
Mixed 246
SusWrite 309
74% 328 MB/s
4K Read 20.9
4K Write 36.8
4K Mixed 20
77% 25.9 MB/s
DQ Read 130
DQ Write 60.1
DQ Mixed 69.4
58% 86.5 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 64.1%
Great: 117%
Hitachi HDS722020ALA330 2TB-$71
2TB free
Firmware: JKAOA3EA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 117 109 114 116 121 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
58.7% Above average
Read 89.1
Write 117
Mixed 55.2
SusWrite 116
69% 94.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
150% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 58.7%
Great: 69%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 999GB
662GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 62 62 63 68 66 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
59.3% Above average
Read 142
Write 72.5
Mixed 52.3
SusWrite 64.6
61% 82.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
154% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 59.3%
Great: 110%
Covecube Virtual Disk 2TB
7TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.3 0.6 0.8 0.3 0.1 45 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
33.7% Below average
Read 109
Write 71.8
Mixed 51.4
SusWrite 7.8
44% 60.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
144% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 33.7%
Great: 105%
WDC WD20 EZRX-00DC0B0 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 0567
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.7 8.7 9.9 9 8.8 8.4 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
29.1% Poor
Read 131
Write 109
Mixed 52.6
SusWrite 8.9
90% 75.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 0.9
122% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 29.1%
Great: 57%
WDC WD40 EZRZ-00GXCB0 4TB
3.5TB free, PID 0567
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.2 0.4 1 0.7 0.2 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
25.9% Poor
Read 126
Write 92.2
Mixed 60.9
SusWrite 0.4
82% 69.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.9
116% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 25.9%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Toshiba-0098 KHX1600C10D3/8GX KHX1600C10D3/8GX 9905403-558.A00LF KHX1600C10D3/8GX 32GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
83% Excellent
MC Read 31.8
MC Write 34.1
MC Mixed 30.4
92% 32.1 GB/s
SC Read 15.7
SC Write 14.2
SC Mixed 12.7
41% 14.2 GB/s
Latency 75
53% 75 ns
Poor: 78%
This bench: 83%
Great: 83%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Precision T3600 Builds (Compare 2,971 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Dell Precision T3600

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $370
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $72
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback