Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 1% Tree trunk	Desktop 22% Surfboard	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 16.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	4.44% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A6 PRO-7400B R5, 6 Compute Cores 2C+4G 456 User benchmarks, average bench 35% P0, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	16.4% Very poor	Memory 20.6 1-Core 54 2-Core 58.8 26% 44.5 Pts	4-Core 72.7 8-Core 59.6 9% 66.1 Pts	64-Core 71.2 4% 71.2 Pts
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 16.4% Great: 44%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon R5 Graphics 4,872 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Elitegroup(1019 99AE) 128MB Ram: 128MB, Driver: 20.10.35.02 Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	4.44% Terrible	Lighting 5.1 Reflection 5 Parallax 6.6 4% 5.57 fps	MRender 4.4 Gravity 5.2 Splatting 7.9 5% 5.83 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.44% Great: 5%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Seagate ST3160215AS 160GB-$32 6,007 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 71GB free (System drive) Firmware: 4.AAB SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.2 10 14 11 6.8 10 MB/s Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		Read 6.2 Write 12.2 Mixed 7.2 SusWrite 8.9 6% 8.62 MB/s	4K Read 0.1 4K Mixed 0 6% 0.05 MB/s
Poor: 11% Great: 41%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$37 1,120,098 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 238GB free Firmware: CC43 SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 164 165 136 46 52 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	80.5% Excellent	Read 164 Write 153 Mixed 60.1 SusWrite 118 90% 124 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.6 99% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 80.5% Great: 113%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Apacer 78.B1GET.4000C 2x4GB 12 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	26.1% Poor	MC Read 10.8 MC Write 7.1 MC Mixed 10.7 27% 9.53 GB/s	SC Read 6.9 SC Write 7.7 SC Mixed 8.8 22% 7.8 GB/s	Latency 316 13% 316 ns
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 26.1% Great: 57%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 50%

Yacht

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

CPU
A8-6500 APUAMD $135Bench 50%, 7,219 samples	2x
A6 PRO-7400B R5, 6 Compute Cores 2C+4GAMDBench 35%, 456 samples	2x
A4-5300B APUAMDBench 39%, 2,157 samples	1x

GPU
Radeon HD 8570DAMDBench 4%, 8,328 samples	2x
Radeon HD 7480DAMDBench 2%, 8,289 samples	1x
GeForce GT 610NvidiaBench 2%, 62,458 samples	1x

SSD
256GB 256GBSSDBench 77%, 9,229 samples	1x

RAM
78.B1GET.4000C 2x4GBApacerBench 41%, 12 samples	2x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	1x
HMT41GU6AFR8A-PB 1x8GBHynixBench 27%, 1,957 samples	1x

Value: 61% - Good

Total price: $135