Today's hottest deals

MSI MS-16R5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics5.04% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive179% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMicro-Star GF63 Thin 10SC
MotherboardMSI MS-16R5  (all builds)
Memory10.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210830
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 18 '22 at 06:33
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 24%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10500H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
72.7% Very good
Memory 93.1
1-Core 76.4
2-Core 167
67% 112 Pts
4-Core 290
8-Core 381
43% 335 Pts
64-Core 439
27% 439 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 72.7%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
MSI(1462 12F4) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1994
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
5.04% Terrible
Lighting 5.3
Reflection 4.4
Parallax 6.4
4% 5.37 fps
MRender 9.1
Gravity 5.4
Splatting 8.8
6% 7.77 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.04%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston OM8PDP3256B-AI1 256GB
155GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EDFK0S03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1060 957 309 301 301 315 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
179% Outstanding
Read 1,310
Write 1,187
Mixed 1,105
SusWrite 540
232% 1,035 MB/s
4K Read 47.2
4K Write 132
4K Mixed 64.8
224% 81.2 MB/s
DQ Read 616
DQ Write 449
DQ Mixed 521
392% 528 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 179%
Great: 211%
Seagate ST1000LM048-2E7172 1TB
931GB free
Firmware: V0414A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 402 395 382 358 356 361 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - drive id incomplete or inconclusive
Read 438
Write 355
Mixed 346
SusWrite 375
281% 379 MB/s
4K Read 32.5
4K Write 85.7
4K Mixed 26
5,830% 48.1 MB/s
DQ Read 153
DQ Write 321
DQ Mixed 46.2
988% 173 MB/s
Poor: 29% Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8ATF1G64HZ-3G2R1 Kingston HP26D4S9S8HJ-8 16GB
3200, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
73.1% Very good
MC Read 27.7
MC Write 26.5
MC Mixed 21.1
72% 25.1 GB/s
SC Read 16.6
SC Write 33.2
SC Mixed 24
70% 24.6 GB/s
Latency 62
64% 62 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 73.1%
Great: 73%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MS-16R5 Builds (Compare 5,045 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI MS-16R5

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $82
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback