Today's hottest deals

MSI MS-16R5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (14th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 86 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics34.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive71.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMicro-Star GF63 Thin 10SC
MotherboardMSI MS-16R5  (all builds)
Memory3 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210830
Uptime3.6 Days
Run DateFeb 23 '23 at 18:40
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 24%

 PC Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10500H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
35.8% Below average
Memory 21.4
1-Core 109
2-Core 163
50% 97.8 Pts
4-Core 269
8-Core 388
41% 328 Pts
64-Core 456
28% 456 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 35.8%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design
MSI(1462 12F4) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.1659
Performing below potential (49th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
34.7% Below average
Lighting 41.2
Reflection 57.8
Parallax 34.4
34% 44.5 fps
MRender 51.6
Gravity 43.2
Splatting 41.7
37% 45.5 fps
Poor: 28%
This bench: 34.7%
Great: 39%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston OM8PDP3256B-AI1 256GB
62GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EDFK0S03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 214 376 236 382 155 272 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
71.7% Very good
Read 158
Write 431
Mixed 584
SusWrite 273
83% 362 MB/s
4K Read 4.7
4K Write 60.8
4K Mixed 39.8
90% 35.1 MB/s
DQ Read 527
DQ Write 308
DQ Mixed 329
269% 388 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 71.7%
Great: 211%
T-force 1TB 1TB
954GB free
Firmware: SBFMLB.5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 258 286 288 94 44 42 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
62% Good
Read 329
Write 258
Mixed 248
SusWrite 169
56% 251 MB/s
4K Read 22
4K Write 48.4
4K Mixed 22.5
88% 31 MB/s
DQ Read 245
DQ Write 285
DQ Mixed 191
164% 240 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 62%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43EB1-CWE 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
19.7% Very poor
MC Read 7.4
MC Write 8
MC Mixed 6.4
21% 7.27 GB/s
SC Read 3.7
SC Write 7.1
SC Mixed 4.1
14% 4.97 GB/s
Latency 310
13% 310 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 19.7%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MS-16R5 Builds (Compare 5,047 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI MS-16R5

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback