Today's hottest deals

Asus ASUS TUF Gaming A15 FA507RM_FA507RM

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics91.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemAsus ASUS TUF Gaming A15 FA507RM_FA507RM  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FA507RM
Memory27.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220808
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 23 '22 at 18:46
Run Duration149 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H
FP7, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
91.1% Outstanding
Memory 65.1
1-Core 160
2-Core 322
94% 182 Pts
4-Core 627
8-Core 1,032
101% 829 Pts
64-Core 1,334
83% 1,334 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 91.1%
Great: 98%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060 (Laptop)
Asus(1043 1E8C) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 21.40.18.04
Performing below potential (56th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
91.7% Outstanding
Lighting 122
Reflection 114
Parallax 127
99% 121 fps
MRender 126
Gravity 88
Splatting 77.2
77% 97 fps
Poor: 67%
This bench: 91.7%
Great: 105%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$100
882GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,262
Write 2,201
Mixed 2,214
429% 1,892 MB/s
4K Read 65.4
4K Write 141
4K Mixed 85.9
284% 97.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1,378
DQ Write 1085
DQ Mixed 1,213
912% 1,225 MB/s
Poor: 188% Great: 410%
Intel SSDPEKNU512GZ 512GB
477GB free
Firmware: 002C
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,989
Write 1,598
Mixed 1,272
359% 1,620 MB/s
4K Read 60.9
4K Write 142
4K Mixed 78.5
268% 93.8 MB/s
DQ Read 440
DQ Write 1,170
DQ Mixed 407
425% 672 MB/s
Poor: 99% Great: 290%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMCG78MEBSA092N CT16G48C40S5.M8A1 32GB
4800, 4800 MHz
16384, 16384 MB
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
111% Outstanding
MC Read 42.1
MC Write 45.9
MC Mixed 40.4
122% 42.8 GB/s
SC Read 15.6
SC Write 36.4
SC Mixed 20.7
69% 24.2 GB/s
Latency 114
35% 114 ns
Poor: 111%
This bench: 111%
Great: 129%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ASUS TUF Gaming A15 FA507RM_FA507RM Builds (Compare 131 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 76%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 76%
Battleship

System: Asus ASUS TUF Gaming A15 FA507RM_FA507RM

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback